Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
[REDACTED]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Piratecat" data-source="post: 5508181" data-attributes="member: 2"><p>Hmm. I'm sure I've done that.</p><p></p><p>Here's the deal. We expect people to behave like adults and to get along. If they can't do that - on the rare occasion that there's infantile squabbling instead of real discourse and a genuine disagreement - I don't feel a lot of remorse about expressing my displeasure. That can either be done privately, when that's the most effective solution, or it can mean making a public example out of the people who are misbehaving. That doesn't happen too often, but when it does it's generally well deserved and highly effective at letting people know what is unacceptable behavior.</p><p></p><p>There's a big difference between people arguing and people being jerks. I'm happy to make that distinction.</p><p></p><p>One thing that has greatly helped is that we now flag the first post that starts a chain of problem, editing it with mod-text to make it clear that this isn't okay. That also helps set standards and expectations for people reading. When the post that makes you furious is already flagged, you're less likely to respond in kind.</p><p></p><p>I also make a point of not moderating in anger. There are a very few people in this world who make me see red, but one or two of them post here. I let other people moderate them when necessary, because I'm not sure I'd give them a fair shake. Similarly, if someone makes us really angry we're likely to give them a few days off and discuss it in the Moderator Forum before deciding on a final action. I have no problem apologizing or reversing a decision if we think we've made a mistake, and we always get multi-mod input on the tricky cases.</p><p></p><p>Sometimes, though, members think someone is being a troll just because they don't happen to agree with them. From a neutral third-party perspective it's often not the case. That's when ignore lists prove invaluable. If someone is smart and interesting, I would always rather rehab their posting style than boot them off the site because of temporary friction. Different opinions are <em>interesting</em> so long as you're not coming off as a jerk when you're expressing them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Piratecat, post: 5508181, member: 2"] Hmm. I'm sure I've done that. Here's the deal. We expect people to behave like adults and to get along. If they can't do that - on the rare occasion that there's infantile squabbling instead of real discourse and a genuine disagreement - I don't feel a lot of remorse about expressing my displeasure. That can either be done privately, when that's the most effective solution, or it can mean making a public example out of the people who are misbehaving. That doesn't happen too often, but when it does it's generally well deserved and highly effective at letting people know what is unacceptable behavior. There's a big difference between people arguing and people being jerks. I'm happy to make that distinction. One thing that has greatly helped is that we now flag the first post that starts a chain of problem, editing it with mod-text to make it clear that this isn't okay. That also helps set standards and expectations for people reading. When the post that makes you furious is already flagged, you're less likely to respond in kind. I also make a point of not moderating in anger. There are a very few people in this world who make me see red, but one or two of them post here. I let other people moderate them when necessary, because I'm not sure I'd give them a fair shake. Similarly, if someone makes us really angry we're likely to give them a few days off and discuss it in the Moderator Forum before deciding on a final action. I have no problem apologizing or reversing a decision if we think we've made a mistake, and we always get multi-mod input on the tricky cases. Sometimes, though, members think someone is being a troll just because they don't happen to agree with them. From a neutral third-party perspective it's often not the case. That's when ignore lists prove invaluable. If someone is smart and interesting, I would always rather rehab their posting style than boot them off the site because of temporary friction. Different opinions are [I]interesting[/I] so long as you're not coming off as a jerk when you're expressing them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
[REDACTED]
Top