our group has multiple DMs, and the DM for that group is away and wants our characters ready when he gets back, so it is a debate between me and the other player
(there are three players, yeah, small group, I know)
so as to what the DM says, we all DM, we all see the rules differently..the player said he only wants the +2 natural armor from the feat, to cancel out the -2 to AC barbarians get in rage....so to him making a feat that just gets you a +2 natural armor bonus makes perfect sense
some how, giving people a +2 natural armor bonus for no reason at all is a tad bit dumb, IMO
I mean magic Items sure, dragon totem feats, sure, feats that build on natural armor, totally fine, but granting someone who doesnt have natural armor natural armor is a bit powerful, maybe if you had to have a base attack +6, Constitution 16 and the rage ability, MAYBE, but the feat idea of "Just a +2 to armor to cancel out the barbarian's rage" is very powerful, there is a reason they get a -2 to ac