Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Reinventing Roleplaying Games
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Metal Pope" data-source="post: 1573603" data-attributes="member: 17046"><p><strong>Psychology</strong></p><p></p><p>As a therapist, I often see the following happening: person A says something, than person B, who has known person A since a long time, says: 'no, that's not what you're real motivation, you're real motivation is...' After this, person A tries to convince person B (s)he is honest about his or her motivations, but person B doesn't believe person A because (s)he 'knows him/her so well'. Well guess what? In most cases, person B is WRONG and (s)he should just listen to what his or her friend is saying.</p><p></p><p>A similar thing is happening here: MythusMage, there seems to be a general consensus that the word 'hobby' has some negative connotations, just as the word 'game' has. This said, I submit to you that no one word will invoke the same associations in everyone. The truth is, there are NO UNIVERSAL associations. There IS a larger percentage of chance that a given word will invoke specific associations on a whole, but there's NEVER a 100% chance that EVERYONE will associate with the same things. </p><p></p><p>This said, it DOES seem most people here don't find the word 'hobby' 'clicks' with them better than the word 'game' does. Chances are, it won't 'click' better with the general populace, either. I know this is hard to accept as it apparently infringes on YOUR world view, but the fact is that world views differ and apparently the prevalent one regarding this concept is: it won't work. To be sure, one needs to do marketing research and even then there will be a large margin of error.</p><p></p><p>I would also like to note many of the name changes you propose have already been used. (For example, in the case of the DM, 'Keeper of Secrets' in Call of Cthulhu, 'Storyteller' in White Wolf Games, etc.) Also, the emphasis you want to lay on RPG's is one many gamers already use. Most mature players like to 'ROLE-play, not ROLL-play', and most of the points you've raised are automatically implied when you try to act out a character 'in-character'.</p><p></p><p>Many many many RPG's include great roleplaying tips, which form the basis of what you call 'a guidebook'. 'Amber', for example, dit this very well. I also don't think ROLE-playing and rules are mutually exclusive: I personally like interesting, realistic rules, or interesting gaming systems, such as the ones found in The Dying Earth RPG, Hero System, Silhouette, Rolemaster and more. But my no means does any set of rules exclude acting out what is happening. In fact, I'm a published writer myself and I review lots of stuff in our own Dutch-language sf/fantasy/horror magazine at <a href="http://www.fantastiek.com" target="_blank">www.fantastiek.com</a>.</p><p></p><p>Although I don't like hack 'n' slash, there's a market for it and you'll lose many potential buyers if you decree THIS GAME SHOULD ONLY BE USED AS... On top of that, you are missing a very important point. Namely, NO GUIDE, NO SYSTEM, can change the people playing it. Some people will want to emphasize aspect A, others will want to emphasize aspect B. The same thing goes for this hobby (and it IS a hobby, as well as a game, I think) being seen as primarily played by nerds. Well, that's because many of us DO act nerd-like around others. Even I am sometimes put off by my players constantly talking about how well de did during the latest RPG-session, or about their characters' statistics, etc. And still, most of them really ACT OUT their parts while playing! You will NEVER be able to change this, as this would mean you would have to become God and change human nature itself.</p><p></p><p>Of course, many of us AREN'T 'nerdish', but the general perception of the people at large will have to be changed by OUR OWN INDIVIDUAL ACTIONS and not by changing the name 'role-playing game' itself. I think most of us do try to promote our hobby, we bring in new people, they bring in others, etc. The only thing we can try is present this hobby as something which we don't talk about constantly... if people think we have NO LIVES because we keep yapping about our hobby, it's going to become difficult to draw them in.</p><p></p><p>Apart from that, RPG's CAN be marketed more efficiently. The problem is: it will take better marketing strategies AND more money for that... And the pool of potential players isn't THAT large, although I don't think we know how large it IS. </p><p></p><p>Shortly put: it's in our own hands, and RPG's will always be moulded according to individual tastes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Metal Pope, post: 1573603, member: 17046"] [b]Psychology[/b] As a therapist, I often see the following happening: person A says something, than person B, who has known person A since a long time, says: 'no, that's not what you're real motivation, you're real motivation is...' After this, person A tries to convince person B (s)he is honest about his or her motivations, but person B doesn't believe person A because (s)he 'knows him/her so well'. Well guess what? In most cases, person B is WRONG and (s)he should just listen to what his or her friend is saying. A similar thing is happening here: MythusMage, there seems to be a general consensus that the word 'hobby' has some negative connotations, just as the word 'game' has. This said, I submit to you that no one word will invoke the same associations in everyone. The truth is, there are NO UNIVERSAL associations. There IS a larger percentage of chance that a given word will invoke specific associations on a whole, but there's NEVER a 100% chance that EVERYONE will associate with the same things. This said, it DOES seem most people here don't find the word 'hobby' 'clicks' with them better than the word 'game' does. Chances are, it won't 'click' better with the general populace, either. I know this is hard to accept as it apparently infringes on YOUR world view, but the fact is that world views differ and apparently the prevalent one regarding this concept is: it won't work. To be sure, one needs to do marketing research and even then there will be a large margin of error. I would also like to note many of the name changes you propose have already been used. (For example, in the case of the DM, 'Keeper of Secrets' in Call of Cthulhu, 'Storyteller' in White Wolf Games, etc.) Also, the emphasis you want to lay on RPG's is one many gamers already use. Most mature players like to 'ROLE-play, not ROLL-play', and most of the points you've raised are automatically implied when you try to act out a character 'in-character'. Many many many RPG's include great roleplaying tips, which form the basis of what you call 'a guidebook'. 'Amber', for example, dit this very well. I also don't think ROLE-playing and rules are mutually exclusive: I personally like interesting, realistic rules, or interesting gaming systems, such as the ones found in The Dying Earth RPG, Hero System, Silhouette, Rolemaster and more. But my no means does any set of rules exclude acting out what is happening. In fact, I'm a published writer myself and I review lots of stuff in our own Dutch-language sf/fantasy/horror magazine at [url]www.fantastiek.com[/url]. Although I don't like hack 'n' slash, there's a market for it and you'll lose many potential buyers if you decree THIS GAME SHOULD ONLY BE USED AS... On top of that, you are missing a very important point. Namely, NO GUIDE, NO SYSTEM, can change the people playing it. Some people will want to emphasize aspect A, others will want to emphasize aspect B. The same thing goes for this hobby (and it IS a hobby, as well as a game, I think) being seen as primarily played by nerds. Well, that's because many of us DO act nerd-like around others. Even I am sometimes put off by my players constantly talking about how well de did during the latest RPG-session, or about their characters' statistics, etc. And still, most of them really ACT OUT their parts while playing! You will NEVER be able to change this, as this would mean you would have to become God and change human nature itself. Of course, many of us AREN'T 'nerdish', but the general perception of the people at large will have to be changed by OUR OWN INDIVIDUAL ACTIONS and not by changing the name 'role-playing game' itself. I think most of us do try to promote our hobby, we bring in new people, they bring in others, etc. The only thing we can try is present this hobby as something which we don't talk about constantly... if people think we have NO LIVES because we keep yapping about our hobby, it's going to become difficult to draw them in. Apart from that, RPG's CAN be marketed more efficiently. The problem is: it will take better marketing strategies AND more money for that... And the pool of potential players isn't THAT large, although I don't think we know how large it IS. Shortly put: it's in our own hands, and RPG's will always be moulded according to individual tastes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Reinventing Roleplaying Games
Top