Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Release Day Second Edition Amazon Sales Rank
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 7981394" data-attributes="member: 957"><p>Ultimately, there is little way to argue with this.</p><p>But there are some things to consider. </p><p>If you look at PF vs. 3.5, PF embraces the over the top magic implicit in 3.5 and runs with it. It is little things like tweaks to sorcerers, but they kinda "turned it to 11". And there were people who complained that PF embraced the worst of 3.5*. But overall it seemed to resonate. They didn't come up with the chili recipe, but they added a pinch of one new seasoning and made it even more popular. After all, it did last for nearly a decade AFTER 3.5. That is an achievement.</p><p></p><p>And the APG was an extremely well received book. There are a lot of things in there that are purely PF and are now iconic. </p><p></p><p>But all that came out fast. It seems that we got the "greatest hits" of everything the staff have developed, played, and refined throughout the 3X days prior to PF, just cleaned up and aligned to one clear baseline.</p><p></p><p>After that, they were "fine". I have all the Ultimates books. I do reference them peridically. There is some really good stuff in there. But you have to dig a bit. I have joked that every title was 5% less awesome. But, clearly, that is just my own opinion. </p><p></p><p>It is like when you hear of a band that plays the local circuit for a decade and suddenly gets famous. They have 5 great songs on their first album, but these are all songs they wrote over that decade. Asking them to crank out album #2 is a challenge. Some bands can step up and others struggle.</p><p></p><p>So I guess I think it is somewhere in between. Maybe they didn't have the chops. Maybe they did. I think the 4E is deign team has a great resume, the post mortem on 4E not withstanding. Assumptions you make about how a game will come together when you start design appear to be as important as "chops".</p><p></p><p>* - It always stuck in my head that somebody on these forums back then described that they didn't like PF even though they did like 3.5 because PF had increased the "woo hoo!". <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 7981394, member: 957"] Ultimately, there is little way to argue with this. But there are some things to consider. If you look at PF vs. 3.5, PF embraces the over the top magic implicit in 3.5 and runs with it. It is little things like tweaks to sorcerers, but they kinda "turned it to 11". And there were people who complained that PF embraced the worst of 3.5*. But overall it seemed to resonate. They didn't come up with the chili recipe, but they added a pinch of one new seasoning and made it even more popular. After all, it did last for nearly a decade AFTER 3.5. That is an achievement. And the APG was an extremely well received book. There are a lot of things in there that are purely PF and are now iconic. But all that came out fast. It seems that we got the "greatest hits" of everything the staff have developed, played, and refined throughout the 3X days prior to PF, just cleaned up and aligned to one clear baseline. After that, they were "fine". I have all the Ultimates books. I do reference them peridically. There is some really good stuff in there. But you have to dig a bit. I have joked that every title was 5% less awesome. But, clearly, that is just my own opinion. It is like when you hear of a band that plays the local circuit for a decade and suddenly gets famous. They have 5 great songs on their first album, but these are all songs they wrote over that decade. Asking them to crank out album #2 is a challenge. Some bands can step up and others struggle. So I guess I think it is somewhere in between. Maybe they didn't have the chops. Maybe they did. I think the 4E is deign team has a great resume, the post mortem on 4E not withstanding. Assumptions you make about how a game will come together when you start design appear to be as important as "chops". * - It always stuck in my head that somebody on these forums back then described that they didn't like PF even though they did like 3.5 because PF had increased the "woo hoo!". :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Release Day Second Edition Amazon Sales Rank
Top