Originally posted by Morrus
You won't get the average gamer's opinion from just taking the average of all the ratings. Trust me. This will give a slightly more level-headed reflection of a product's quality.
I do not think that ENworld average is the average gamer opinion, but the ENworld average is still usefull, just look at dragonstar ( 7 reviews, Psion 4, Simon Collins 4, average 4.57 )and rokugan ( 2 review, Psion 5, average 5).
If you weigh the staff review, the dragonstar book will drop, while if someone post a score of 4 for Rokugan, it will drop but the staff review will help keep a good score.
That way it would seem that Rokugan is better appreciated than Dragonstar on ENworld, while in fact Dragonstar get more support on ENboards.
(Currently, products within the 4.5, 5 margin seems to me as being of similar value)
This is usefull if I want to discuss on the setting with others, while their is many people who like dragonstar, their isn't as many who like rokugan. Popularity play a role, sure, and your system might help or hinder some products to get popular on ENboard, I am not sure if it is good or not (it will only affect ENboard).
So I would like to know a bit more on your reasoning to weight staff review, so I can be sure you get the right decision with your website
BTW, everyone - check out the page for the PHB for a demo of how a product should look once everything is up and running. It has links to errata, articles, extra reviews etc.
It is very nice! but one thing is lacking, the author name.
[edit]
Is it possible to have the score that was given in other reviews website next to the link?
Also, if you want every D&D/d20 reviews linked from here:
the major french review website has a D&D section:
http://www.roliste.com/jeu.jsp?id=1322
and a d20 system section:
http://www.roliste.com/jeu.jsp?id=2021
[/edit]