Reviews Section

[Crothian]

look at Ronin arts

 

[DSC-EricPrice]

You could look at Dragon Scale Counters too. We have all good reviews (4-5 stars) yet when you look at the overall, we have a 2. Furthermore, until Crothian did his last review I think it showed us with NO stars, even though we had 3 other reviews that were good.

While Im here, any ETA on when we can get our entry for the company edited? It used to have a picture, point correctly to our page, and have a blurb. Now the blurb is gone, the image is gone, and the link to the homepage has an extra http:// in it.

Thanks for all the hard work.

 

[Crothian]

Hey, Eric, what would you like the Blurp to say? I don't know if we can still do pictures, none of the publisher entries have them right now.

I fixed the home page link

edit: anything anyone wants changed or added just PM me the info or e-mail me at cgath@insight.rr.com

 

[Mark]

< - - - - - Guess what I've been following.

Since I know that CMG has had no reviews below a 3 star rating, and actually is hovering around four stars, because of a solid number of four star reviews and a good number of five star reviews, I've been perplexed that my company has a two star rating by the new system.

Maybe you should create a couple of "control" companies with an easy-to-figure-out Publisher rating (like the one in my example above) so that your system won't fool you into believing it is fixed when it is not.

 

[Mark]

Hey, Eric, what would you like...

If you're going to start taking requests, please start a new thread so that this subject isn't muddied yet again. I've already had to relocate the matter from one other over-worked thread (and the BUG has been pronounced fixed once, when it wasn't), so I'd rather not have the issue confused even more, please.

 

[Mark]

Anyway, I will have a 2 week break to work on this - I intend to have everything trounced within that time.

Mark, I've begun work on the admin section of the reviews site. I should have this information fixed shortly.

It will be fixed today - specifically tonight.

Were's this happening Mark? It'd be useful to watch that specific publisher while I tinker with it to make sure it corrects out.

OK. In addition to the other posts I've made regarding my observations and suggestions, I want to point out that even if you were to "watch that specific publisher" (CMG) while you "tinker with it to make sure it corrects out", you will notice no change from my perspective so I am not the one to ask. All I have access to are the typical pages that anyone visiting the site can see and there has been no change in what I have seen. This has been frustrating, to say the least. I'm not asking for any more promises or even estimates of when this will be corrected, but I would appreciate some answers to the following questions...

1.) Can you remove that aspect of the reviews section (Publisher Rating) until you actually have time to work on it?

2.) Can you give publishers the ability to edit their own sections, so that there is less work for you in regard to non-code areas?

3.) Can you find some way to delegate some of the bugs/fixes that need handling off to other people so that you aren't overtaxed?

 

[Mark]

1.) Can you remove that aspect of the reviews section (Publisher Rating) until you actually have time to work on it?

2.) Can you give publishers the ability to edit their own sections, so that there is less work for you in regard to non-code areas?

3.) Can you find some way to delegate some of the bugs/fixes that need handling off to other people so that you aren't overtaxed?

bump

 

[Michael Morris]

1. is done too.

 

[Mark]

1. is done too.

Thanks!

1.) Can you remove that aspect of the reviews section (Publisher Rating) until you actually have time to work on it?

2.) Can you give publishers the ability to edit their own sections, so that there is less work for you in regard to non-code areas?

3.) Can you find some way to delegate some of the bugs/fixes that need handling off to other people so that you aren't overtaxed?