HellHound
ENnies winner and NOT Scrappy Doo
Some people insist that INSTEAD of reprinting the core rules with the errata and revisions in them, WotC should be reprinting the core rules exactly as-is, including all errors, mistakes, inconsistancies and material to be changed in the revision, and then include a FOURTH core rules book, a book of errata.
IN MY OPINION,
This would be, by necessity, a book with ALL the monsters from the Monster Manual in it (since they are including new information in every statblock, and in every monster entry), at LEAST four character classes (the "tweener" classes), all the new prestige classes fromt he splatbooks that they are porting over, all the errata, revised spells and new spells, new feats, etc.
IN YOUR OPINION,
Which do you think would be the 'proper' choice for WotC at this point? It is a given that the 3rd edition revision is going to happen and will be released this summer, that is not up for debate. In your opinion, should they reprint the core rules as-is and also publish an errata book, or should they add the errata and changes directly to the Core Rules (as they are going to do)?
IN MY OPINION,
This would be, by necessity, a book with ALL the monsters from the Monster Manual in it (since they are including new information in every statblock, and in every monster entry), at LEAST four character classes (the "tweener" classes), all the new prestige classes fromt he splatbooks that they are porting over, all the errata, revised spells and new spells, new feats, etc.
IN YOUR OPINION,
Which do you think would be the 'proper' choice for WotC at this point? It is a given that the 3rd edition revision is going to happen and will be released this summer, that is not up for debate. In your opinion, should they reprint the core rules as-is and also publish an errata book, or should they add the errata and changes directly to the Core Rules (as they are going to do)?