Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Rich Baker on Gnomes in 4E
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dannyalcatraz" data-source="post: 3975919" data-attributes="member: 19675"><p>Yeah, I got that- sorry if I wasn't clear.</p><p></p><p>However, the point remains that despite 30 years of history, gnomes were considered "marginal" enough to be excised from the 4Ed PHB- a decision I'm not fond of.</p><p></p><p>And the second point stands as well: what WotC considers "marginal" may not be the case for many of their installed base as several posts in this thread illustrate. Many campaigns and player choices are going to be affected by this attitude.</p><p></p><p>This is especially the case if, as he says, that 4Ed won't include full hardcopy treatments of those races. 3.5 does just fine- a simple perusal of the various MMs, "Races of" books etc. have all kinds of variant races that one could call "marginal" and nobody complains about it.</p><p></p><p>4Ed's minimizing the hardcopy info on those races gimps player choice right out of the starting gate, plain & simple.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Didn't ask 'em to.</p><p></p><p>Didn't ask 'em to excise gnomes, either.</p><p></p><p>I know WotC did research, I also know that market research can sometimes be skewed by accidentally getting a non-representative sample. It's also very difficult to guage the actual quality of research that suggests that something that is a known quantity (gnomes) be discarded in favor of an unknown quantity (dragonborn), but many could easily <em>interpret </em>it as suspect.</p><p></p><p>(Not that I'm knocking the dragonborn- they seem to be pretty decent so far- superior to many of the racial variants for elves, dwarves & orcs that have come down the pipe in the past few decades.)</p><p></p><p></p><p>Considering:</p><p></p><p>1) the number of DMs I've encountered in 30 years of gaming (experience, not evidence- YMMV) who bar PCs of any race not in the PHB, making them de facto unplayable for some players, and</p><p></p><p>2) what an absence of racial feats <em>could</em> mean in the as-yet-unseen system as a whole, </p><p></p><p>I can't give your response much creedence at this time.</p><p></p><p>Those Racial feats could be marginal and largely flavorful, or they could be "must have" <u>gold</u>. Right now, <em>We don't know which they are</em>. If its the latter, you could see the virtual disappearance of players playing "suboptimal" races who lack them.</p><p></p><p>Consider me an 'apprehensive wait-and-see" consumer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dannyalcatraz, post: 3975919, member: 19675"] Yeah, I got that- sorry if I wasn't clear. However, the point remains that despite 30 years of history, gnomes were considered "marginal" enough to be excised from the 4Ed PHB- a decision I'm not fond of. And the second point stands as well: what WotC considers "marginal" may not be the case for many of their installed base as several posts in this thread illustrate. Many campaigns and player choices are going to be affected by this attitude. This is especially the case if, as he says, that 4Ed won't include full hardcopy treatments of those races. 3.5 does just fine- a simple perusal of the various MMs, "Races of" books etc. have all kinds of variant races that one could call "marginal" and nobody complains about it. 4Ed's minimizing the hardcopy info on those races gimps player choice right out of the starting gate, plain & simple. Didn't ask 'em to. Didn't ask 'em to excise gnomes, either. I know WotC did research, I also know that market research can sometimes be skewed by accidentally getting a non-representative sample. It's also very difficult to guage the actual quality of research that suggests that something that is a known quantity (gnomes) be discarded in favor of an unknown quantity (dragonborn), but many could easily [I]interpret [/I]it as suspect. (Not that I'm knocking the dragonborn- they seem to be pretty decent so far- superior to many of the racial variants for elves, dwarves & orcs that have come down the pipe in the past few decades.) Considering: 1) the number of DMs I've encountered in 30 years of gaming (experience, not evidence- YMMV) who bar PCs of any race not in the PHB, making them de facto unplayable for some players, and 2) what an absence of racial feats [I]could[/I] mean in the as-yet-unseen system as a whole, I can't give your response much creedence at this time. Those Racial feats could be marginal and largely flavorful, or they could be "must have" [U]gold[/U]. Right now, [I]We don't know which they are[/I]. If its the latter, you could see the virtual disappearance of players playing "suboptimal" races who lack them. Consider me an 'apprehensive wait-and-see" consumer. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Rich Baker on Gnomes in 4E
Top