Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Rich Baker on Gnomes in 4E
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mustrum_Ridcully" data-source="post: 3986638" data-attributes="member: 710"><p>Or maybe: How?</p><p></p><p>The way I look at it, WotC could have given us core Necromancers, Illusionist, variant Dragons with spells, Druids, Gnomes and so on together with everything they have so far. </p><p>In 2009. Without handing out any products in the meantime.</p><p></p><p>But they decided otherwise. They knew they have a good grasp of their rules, and even if tinkering is still possible, they know it's no longer necessary, because it has achieved all design goals they wanted. So they put out the first books with the new rule system in form of the first 3 4E core rulebooks. </p><p></p><p>After that, they continue working on all the classes, races and other material they want. They bring it out in Campaign Settings and the new Core rulebooks proposed each year.</p><p></p><p>So basically, the alternatives for people that want Gnome Druids or Half Orc Barbarians were this: </p><p>- Wait until 4E is released, but delay it to 2009. </p><p>- Have 4E released now, but wait to 2009 for Gnomes and Druids. </p><p></p><p>If you desperately, 100 % certainly will need the Gnome Druids and can't improvise anything around it (including pretending the exist but not actually using them), well, this means you have to wait to 2009. WotC misses out a few initial sales, but they won't lose them in the long run. Unless they figure out nobody likes 4E. Which means at least they can throw it away and return to 3.x for 2009, not having yet another year without sales.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mustrum_Ridcully, post: 3986638, member: 710"] Or maybe: How? The way I look at it, WotC could have given us core Necromancers, Illusionist, variant Dragons with spells, Druids, Gnomes and so on together with everything they have so far. In 2009. Without handing out any products in the meantime. But they decided otherwise. They knew they have a good grasp of their rules, and even if tinkering is still possible, they know it's no longer necessary, because it has achieved all design goals they wanted. So they put out the first books with the new rule system in form of the first 3 4E core rulebooks. After that, they continue working on all the classes, races and other material they want. They bring it out in Campaign Settings and the new Core rulebooks proposed each year. So basically, the alternatives for people that want Gnome Druids or Half Orc Barbarians were this: - Wait until 4E is released, but delay it to 2009. - Have 4E released now, but wait to 2009 for Gnomes and Druids. If you desperately, 100 % certainly will need the Gnome Druids and can't improvise anything around it (including pretending the exist but not actually using them), well, this means you have to wait to 2009. WotC misses out a few initial sales, but they won't lose them in the long run. Unless they figure out nobody likes 4E. Which means at least they can throw it away and return to 3.x for 2009, not having yet another year without sales. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Rich Baker on Gnomes in 4E
Top