Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
ring of evasion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 34440" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>I think looking at the cost of other magical items is not the way to go.</p><p></p><p>The costs in the DMG are just plain all over the place. Plus, the cost for class abilities or even feats should be extremely high.</p><p></p><p>I think the key phrase here is:</p><p></p><p>"as if she had the evasion ability"</p><p></p><p>What does this really mean?</p><p></p><p>To me, it means all of the advantages and disadvantages of the ability, not just the advantages.</p><p></p><p>For example, if we were talking about a Ring of Gaseous Form, we really would not be talking about creatures who could be both gaseous and could attack into the normal plane of existence.</p><p></p><p>No, we would be talking about what is possible for PCs with the spell.</p><p></p><p>So, to me, we are talking about what is possible for PCs with the ability of Evasion.</p><p></p><p>Going beyond this just appears to be incorrect.</p><p></p><p>You have to remember that a sentence such as "Rogues and monks cannot use evasion in medium or heavy armor.” is not in any way meant to handle every single case. In fact, Shadowdancers (who are also limited to light armor with Evasion) are not mentioned, nor is the Ring of Evasion. Does that mean that you can assume that they do not have the same Evasion advantages and disadvantages because this one sentence in the DMG did not explicitly call them out?</p><p></p><p>I don’t think so.</p><p></p><p>To me, that is just semantics. I think that creatures who explicitly call out that they do not have the limitation do not. Everyone else in every other circumstance does. To me, it’s not a property of the ability, but rather how non-light armor affects that ability. It’s like damage reduction. It’s not that the creature is not resistant to damage, it’s that a powerful enough magical weapon will ignore that resistance. It’s not that the ring does not give the character Evasion, it’s that heavy enough armor prevents Evasion from working, just like it limits the character’s speed.</p><p></p><p>In fact, the sentence “Some creatures with the innate evasion ability do not face this limitation” implies an exception to the normal rule and that most creatures with the innate evasion ability (and every other possible case) do indeed face this limitation.</p><p></p><p>JMO, but nothing else makes sense. YMMV.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 34440, member: 2011"] I think looking at the cost of other magical items is not the way to go. The costs in the DMG are just plain all over the place. Plus, the cost for class abilities or even feats should be extremely high. I think the key phrase here is: "as if she had the evasion ability" What does this really mean? To me, it means all of the advantages and disadvantages of the ability, not just the advantages. For example, if we were talking about a Ring of Gaseous Form, we really would not be talking about creatures who could be both gaseous and could attack into the normal plane of existence. No, we would be talking about what is possible for PCs with the spell. So, to me, we are talking about what is possible for PCs with the ability of Evasion. Going beyond this just appears to be incorrect. You have to remember that a sentence such as "Rogues and monks cannot use evasion in medium or heavy armor.” is not in any way meant to handle every single case. In fact, Shadowdancers (who are also limited to light armor with Evasion) are not mentioned, nor is the Ring of Evasion. Does that mean that you can assume that they do not have the same Evasion advantages and disadvantages because this one sentence in the DMG did not explicitly call them out? I don’t think so. To me, that is just semantics. I think that creatures who explicitly call out that they do not have the limitation do not. Everyone else in every other circumstance does. To me, it’s not a property of the ability, but rather how non-light armor affects that ability. It’s like damage reduction. It’s not that the creature is not resistant to damage, it’s that a powerful enough magical weapon will ignore that resistance. It’s not that the ring does not give the character Evasion, it’s that heavy enough armor prevents Evasion from working, just like it limits the character’s speed. In fact, the sentence “Some creatures with the innate evasion ability do not face this limitation” implies an exception to the normal rule and that most creatures with the innate evasion ability (and every other possible case) do indeed face this limitation. JMO, but nothing else makes sense. YMMV. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
ring of evasion
Top