Rogue/mage

[axehand]

If a rogue/mage hit an enemy that was flanked with a touch attack spell would he get his sneak attack bonus damge also. Could you use a regular attack with the spell charged and do normal dam. + the spell?

 

[Darklone]

Yes. Arcane Tricksters are all about this schtick.

 

[Magic Slim]

Could you use a regular attack with the spell charged and do normal dam. + the spell?

Yes but, he'll have less chance to hit (since a regular attack is harder than a touch attack), and he'll do basic unarmed damage (1d3 subdual for medium-sized creatures). The wizard in question couldn't use his weapon to deliver the attack.

Slim

 

[Sanackranib]

there is however a feat in the quintessential wizard that allows toch attacks to be delivered with a weapon. if you roll high enough to hit them then you get both weapon and spell damage - and by extension sneak attack damage. however if you only roll highenough for a touch attack then they are only subject to spell damage.

 

[Kae'Yoss]

there is however a feat in the quintessential wizard that allows toch attacks to be delivered with a weapon. if you roll high enough to hit them then you get both weapon and spell damage - and by extension sneak attack damage. however if you only roll highenough for a touch attack then they are only subject to spell damage.

And this is only one feat? Yea, that's quint.

 

[KerlanRayne]

Sneak Attack

I never thought of it before but if you deliver a touch spell with an unarmed strike, do you get sneak attack damage from the normal attack AND the spell? Would Improved Unarmed Strike change this.

KerlanRayne

 

[Magic Slim]

I never thought of it before but if you deliver a touch spell with an unarmed strike, do you get sneak attack damage from the normal attack AND the spell?

Of course not, what's wrong with you?



Welcome to the boards.

Slim

 

[Darklone]

Use Vampiric Touch. Your spellcasterlevel won't suffer from multiclassing