Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Rogue's Been in an Awkward Place, And This Survey Might Be Our Last Chance to Let WotC Know.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ECMO3" data-source="post: 9231033" data-attributes="member: 7030563"><p>IME most partys are 4 or 5 players. If we are talking about a Rogue being in the party already that leaves 3-4 other characters split between 12 classes.</p><p></p><p>I think it is unlikely that you have more than one other martial if you already have a Rogue and more martials are Dex-based than are strength based. Finally, a fair number of parties dispense with actual martials for melee altogether and use Bladesingers or Hexblades as their melee characters.</p><p></p><p>The last three 1-20 campaigns I completed had the following makeup (with the melee characters in bold and my PCs in red):</p><p></p><p>Rogue, Sorlock, <strong><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">Wizard (Bladesinger</span></strong><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">)</span>, Fighter (dex)</p><p><strong><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">Monk, </span>Druid, </strong>Bard/Warlock, Ranger</p><p><strong><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">Fighter (strength)</span>, Rogue/Fighter (strength), </strong>Druid, Sorlock, Artificer</p><p></p><p>Current campaigns I am playing in:</p><p></p><p><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">Wizard,</span><strong> Paladin (strength), Barbarian (strength),</strong> Druid, Rogue - currently 9th level</p><p>Wizard,<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)"> <strong>Monk, </strong>Rogue,</span><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"> Rogue/Bard </span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">- currently 3rd level</span></p><p></p><p>So yeah, when it comes to partys with a Rogue, I think about 50% is a pretty good guess that also have a strength-based martial who is proficient in Athletics.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, or another way to put it is they get twice as many proficiencies through class as most classes do. They also have the best list of skills except for Bard.</p><p></p><p></p><p>You realize that you can only 2 proficiencies through a custom background right?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So I guess you have never seen a Cleric with the Acolyte background or a Druid with a hermit backgroun? Pick up the starter set and look at the pregrenerated characters you will find one.</p><p></p><p>A lot of Clerics have perception, but it is not universal and a lot of players (a majority) will want to play a background (custom or not) which fits their character idea.</p><p></p><p>If it is a matter of just picking skills, and you want Perception, you are right it is easy to get, but that is not how most people play when it comes to selecting a race and background.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is absolutely not true.</p><p></p><p>Wisdom is #2 at worst on every Ranger I can remember seeing played and a fair amount have Wisdom as #1. I play more Rangers than any other class, and when I play a Ranger with average rolls I usually play with a 10 or 12 Constitution. I usually play a Fey Wanderer and I am usually going Wisdom-Dex-Charisma as my top 3 abilities, in that order. Usually I am keeping a 16 Dex until my Wisdom is 20, but I have also played with a 14 Dex.</p><p></p><p>Usually Charisma is my second stat with a Rogue and Wisdom my 3rd, but sometimes those are reversed and sometimes I will take Intelligence as one of them. In any case Constitution is 5th and Strength is 6th.</p><p></p><p>Finally it is not mathematically false. It is false to say that Clerics always have perception proficiency. That is factually untrue.</p><p></p><p>Players overvalue Constitution, is generally the most worthless stat in the game and if you are trying to build a character good at skills putting anything above a 10 in Cosntitution is a MATHEMATICALLY the worst stat to invest in when it comes to having good skills. If you are running around playing Rogues and Rangers with average rolls and dedicate 14+ Constitution, that explains why your Rogues and Rangers are not good at skills. With average rolls my Rogues are going to have a 10 Con and my Rangers a 10 or a 12.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It is totally true.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It is all rules supported.</p><p></p><p>Tying a rope around someone's foot is not an attack. You can argue it is improvise an action, but there are no rules for making an attack to tie off a rope and would not logically be an attack. There are also manacles which are an object and would clearly be "use an object" action to apply, it would seem to me tying a rope is similar.</p><p></p><p>The mage hand spell says in it explicitly that it can <em>"pour out the contents of a vial"</em></p><p></p><p>Minor Illusion is a spell with specific rules around it and requiring an action to investigate.</p><p></p><p>Almost all of this is covered in the rules.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not true. Some of this comes explicitly from MHL which provides for additional things you can do with the hand beyond what is detailed in the spell. Specifically, the following comes from the AT subclass and MHL:</p><p></p><p><em><em>"You can retrieve an object in a container worn or carried by another creature."</em></em></p><p></p><p>That is not explicitly doable with the basic Mage Hand. If the enemy is carrying or wearing his focus, RAW you can take it. DM fiat can overule that, but this is DM fiat overuling RAW.</p><p></p><p>Also, MHL is a bonus action allowing you do also do an action (or use the mage hand twice).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ECMO3, post: 9231033, member: 7030563"] IME most partys are 4 or 5 players. If we are talking about a Rogue being in the party already that leaves 3-4 other characters split between 12 classes. I think it is unlikely that you have more than one other martial if you already have a Rogue and more martials are Dex-based than are strength based. Finally, a fair number of parties dispense with actual martials for melee altogether and use Bladesingers or Hexblades as their melee characters. The last three 1-20 campaigns I completed had the following makeup (with the melee characters in bold and my PCs in red): Rogue, Sorlock, [B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]Wizard (Bladesinger[/COLOR][/B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)])[/COLOR], Fighter (dex) [B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]Monk, [/COLOR]Druid, [/B]Bard/Warlock, Ranger [B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]Fighter (strength)[/COLOR], Rogue/Fighter (strength), [/B]Druid, Sorlock, Artificer Current campaigns I am playing in: [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]Wizard,[/COLOR][B] Paladin (strength), Barbarian (strength),[/B] Druid, Rogue - currently 9th level Wizard,[COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)] [B]Monk, [/B]Rogue,[/COLOR][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)] Rogue/Bard [/COLOR][COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)]- currently 3rd level[/COLOR] So yeah, when it comes to partys with a Rogue, I think about 50% is a pretty good guess that also have a strength-based martial who is proficient in Athletics. Yes, or another way to put it is they get twice as many proficiencies through class as most classes do. They also have the best list of skills except for Bard. You realize that you can only 2 proficiencies through a custom background right? So I guess you have never seen a Cleric with the Acolyte background or a Druid with a hermit backgroun? Pick up the starter set and look at the pregrenerated characters you will find one. A lot of Clerics have perception, but it is not universal and a lot of players (a majority) will want to play a background (custom or not) which fits their character idea. If it is a matter of just picking skills, and you want Perception, you are right it is easy to get, but that is not how most people play when it comes to selecting a race and background. This is absolutely not true. Wisdom is #2 at worst on every Ranger I can remember seeing played and a fair amount have Wisdom as #1. I play more Rangers than any other class, and when I play a Ranger with average rolls I usually play with a 10 or 12 Constitution. I usually play a Fey Wanderer and I am usually going Wisdom-Dex-Charisma as my top 3 abilities, in that order. Usually I am keeping a 16 Dex until my Wisdom is 20, but I have also played with a 14 Dex. Usually Charisma is my second stat with a Rogue and Wisdom my 3rd, but sometimes those are reversed and sometimes I will take Intelligence as one of them. In any case Constitution is 5th and Strength is 6th. Finally it is not mathematically false. It is false to say that Clerics always have perception proficiency. That is factually untrue. Players overvalue Constitution, is generally the most worthless stat in the game and if you are trying to build a character good at skills putting anything above a 10 in Cosntitution is a MATHEMATICALLY the worst stat to invest in when it comes to having good skills. If you are running around playing Rogues and Rangers with average rolls and dedicate 14+ Constitution, that explains why your Rogues and Rangers are not good at skills. With average rolls my Rogues are going to have a 10 Con and my Rangers a 10 or a 12. It is totally true. It is all rules supported. Tying a rope around someone's foot is not an attack. You can argue it is improvise an action, but there are no rules for making an attack to tie off a rope and would not logically be an attack. There are also manacles which are an object and would clearly be "use an object" action to apply, it would seem to me tying a rope is similar. The mage hand spell says in it explicitly that it can [I]"pour out the contents of a vial"[/I] Minor Illusion is a spell with specific rules around it and requiring an action to investigate. Almost all of this is covered in the rules. Not true. Some of this comes explicitly from MHL which provides for additional things you can do with the hand beyond what is detailed in the spell. Specifically, the following comes from the AT subclass and MHL: [I][I]"You can retrieve an object in a container worn or carried by another creature."[/I][/I] That is not explicitly doable with the basic Mage Hand. If the enemy is carrying or wearing his focus, RAW you can take it. DM fiat can overule that, but this is DM fiat overuling RAW. Also, MHL is a bonus action allowing you do also do an action (or use the mage hand twice). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Rogue's Been in an Awkward Place, And This Survey Might Be Our Last Chance to Let WotC Know.
Top