Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 9242476" data-attributes="member: 93670">Read the post I quoted when I explained it.&nbsp; That post was specifically talking about using the 5e tumble to avoid an opportunity attack. Such a thing onlyhappens in an extremely narrow situation as described because of how hard it is to provoke one in the distance a tumble through moves the tumblerThat's my point!&nbsp; I literally said that! The strength athletics check built into the 5e jump RAW is such an an extreme edge case that&nbsp; there is no reason for any class to use dex acrobatics for it&quot;When you land in difficult terrain, you must succeed on a DC 10 Dexterity (Acrobatics) check to land on yourfeet. Otherwise, you land prone.&quot;. Nor does doing the jump involve any other check because. &quot; When you make a long jump, you cover a number of feet up to your Strength score if you move at least least 10 feet on foot immediately before the jump.&quot; Perhaps you meant to quote someone else with this post arguing that my points are correct</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 9242476, member: 93670"] Read the post I quoted when I explained it. That post was specifically talking about using the 5e tumble to avoid an opportunity attack. Such a thing onlyhappens in an extremely narrow situation as described because of how hard it is to provoke one in the distance a tumble through moves the tumbler That's my point! I literally said that! The strength athletics check built into the 5e jump RAW is such an an extreme edge case that there is no reason for any class to use dex acrobatics for it "When you land in difficult terrain, you must succeed on a DC 10 [B]Dexterity (Acrobatics[/B]) check to land on your feet. Otherwise, you land prone.". Nor does doing the jump involve any other check because. " When you make a long jump, you cover a number of feet up to your Strength score if you move at least least 10 feet on foot immediately before the jump." Perhaps you meant to quote someone else with this post arguing that my points are correct [/QUOTE]

Verification