Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rogues flanking at range?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Gryphon" data-source="post: 2114147" data-attributes="member: 17286"><p>Not true, that is your interpretation of the text. Firstly please use the correct terms flanking is not a condition (check the DMG), it is a combat situation.</p><p> </p><p>Of course flanking is not dependent upon combat placement alone. It is based on combat placement and <strong>being able</strong> to make a threatening melee attack (whether you make it or not).</p><p> </p><p>In all of the graphic example provided on the page of the flanking action is shows which character would receive a +2 flanking bonus provided they attacked the target in question. Now obviously all of the characters which receive the +2 flanking bonus are threatening the creature in question otherwise they couldn't be providing a flanking bonus to their opposite character. Therefore by example all creatures that are flanking a creature must also threaten it. And before you say it, it doesn't matter whether the examples only show melee situations or not as they do all show flanking situations.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Your analysis of my previous diagram is irrelevant as far as I am concerned. You are flanking as long as you <strong>would receive</strong> the +2 flanking bonus if you attacked the target, whether you use it or not is up to you. Now that's a fine differentiation as everyone who is flanking <strong>has</strong> the +2 flanking bonus, but if they decide not to attack a creature they flank then they obviously won't be able to use that bonus.</p><p> </p><p>The same thing if I was prone. The modifiers only come into effect <strong>if</strong> they are triggered by an action which they are linked to. If I don't try to make a melee attack while I'm prone I won't <strong>use</strong> the -4 melee modifier, and if no one fires/throws a ranged weapon at me I won't <strong>use</strong> the +4 AC modifier.</p><p> </p><p>Example:</p><p>__P__</p><p>__2X3</p><p>_O___</p><p>1____</p><p> </p><p>Now if we work from the examples shown in the PHB characters 1-3 all have a +2 flanking bonus (1+2 vs. O, 2+3 vs. X). If 2 attacks P he can't use the +2 flanking bonus he could have used against X or O, but that doesn't mean that X or O are no longer flanked as they are still threatened. (Note: this example doesn't include formians <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />)</p><p> </p><p>Therefore formains aren't immune to flanking under my reading of the flanking rules either as as long as they are all threatened (which can only happen in melee combat in the core rules) they are all flanked.</p><p> </p><p>Also note the first part of the flanking text says "When making a melee attack, ...". It doesn't say you <strong>must</strong> make a melee attack against the target to be flanking it (threatening it is enough to flank it), but what it does say is <strong>when</strong> you do make a melee attack against a creature you are flanking you gain a +2 flanking bonus.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Gryphon, post: 2114147, member: 17286"] Not true, that is your interpretation of the text. Firstly please use the correct terms flanking is not a condition (check the DMG), it is a combat situation. Of course flanking is not dependent upon combat placement alone. It is based on combat placement and [b]being able[/b] to make a threatening melee attack (whether you make it or not). In all of the graphic example provided on the page of the flanking action is shows which character would receive a +2 flanking bonus provided they attacked the target in question. Now obviously all of the characters which receive the +2 flanking bonus are threatening the creature in question otherwise they couldn't be providing a flanking bonus to their opposite character. Therefore by example all creatures that are flanking a creature must also threaten it. And before you say it, it doesn't matter whether the examples only show melee situations or not as they do all show flanking situations. Your analysis of my previous diagram is irrelevant as far as I am concerned. You are flanking as long as you [b]would receive[/b] the +2 flanking bonus if you attacked the target, whether you use it or not is up to you. Now that's a fine differentiation as everyone who is flanking [b]has[/b] the +2 flanking bonus, but if they decide not to attack a creature they flank then they obviously won't be able to use that bonus. The same thing if I was prone. The modifiers only come into effect [b]if[/b] they are triggered by an action which they are linked to. If I don't try to make a melee attack while I'm prone I won't [b]use[/b] the -4 melee modifier, and if no one fires/throws a ranged weapon at me I won't [b]use[/b] the +4 AC modifier. Example: __P__ __2X3 _O___ 1____ Now if we work from the examples shown in the PHB characters 1-3 all have a +2 flanking bonus (1+2 vs. O, 2+3 vs. X). If 2 attacks P he can't use the +2 flanking bonus he could have used against X or O, but that doesn't mean that X or O are no longer flanked as they are still threatened. (Note: this example doesn't include formians :p) Therefore formains aren't immune to flanking under my reading of the flanking rules either as as long as they are all threatened (which can only happen in melee combat in the core rules) they are all flanked. Also note the first part of the flanking text says "When making a melee attack, ...". It doesn't say you [b]must[/b] make a melee attack against the target to be flanking it (threatening it is enough to flank it), but what it does say is [b]when[/b] you do make a melee attack against a creature you are flanking you gain a +2 flanking bonus. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rogues flanking at range?
Top