Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 8421823" data-attributes="member: 42582">Sure. But the reverse is true too - that someone's game sucked doesn't show that mine did. And it also doesn't meant that I was doing the same thing as them but just don't get bored when they do.When a group of posters - me, [USER=6696971]@Manbearcat[/USER], [USER=82106]@AbdulAlhazred[/USER], [USER=16586]@Campbell[/USER] are some of them active in this thead, and back in the day there were others, and it seems Ron Edwards is from the same school - converge without colluding on the same understanding of 4e and how and why it works, that suggests that it's more than just wild idiosyncracy or arbitrary differences in taste that meant some of us got great games out of it.I think Edwards's comparison to early Champions - not a game I ever played, but I have a bit of a sense of it - is a pretty interesting one.</blockquote>