Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
RPGNow Expanding...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="madelf" data-source="post: 2633274" data-attributes="member: 15415"><p>Please note that the following is merely my opinion, based on my own observations, but...</p><p></p><p>I've seen nothing to lead me to believe that quality is a significant factor in deciding who goes on the main site and who goes on the Edge. It's all about sales (even the apparent exceptions). As far as I can see, those publishers remaining on the main site are of two types. There are those whose sales currently meet an arbitrary minimum sales level, and those who have shown a strong and steady increase in sales during their time with RPGnow and exhibit the growth potential to meet that minimum level in a relatively short time. The minimum sales target may well vary from category to category (niche products perhaps not held to the same numbers as mainstream products), but it's still all about sales.</p><p></p><p>The only place quality comes into the equation is in the general tendency for better quality products to get better sales than crappy ones (which is unreliable at best, given that factors like marketing, size of the publisher's catalog, and niche vs mainsteam products, will have far more impact on sales). But the split is not being based (so far as I can tell) directly on quality at all. There will be some products on the Edge that are better quality than some products on the main site, and the reverse will also be true. Any claim that a publisher's presense on the main site is somehow a guarantee of top quality, or that Edge publishers are necessarily of lower quality, is simply false. And any perception of such is flawed.</p><p></p><p>That said, there's nothing wrong with using sales as the criteria. It's actually much better than trying to use subjective "quality," since everyone has their own ideas about what constitutes "quality." Whether or not a particular publisher is "quality" cannot be measured objectively. How well their products sell can be.</p><p></p><p>So, that's my 2 cents.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="madelf, post: 2633274, member: 15415"] Please note that the following is merely my opinion, based on my own observations, but... I've seen nothing to lead me to believe that quality is a significant factor in deciding who goes on the main site and who goes on the Edge. It's all about sales (even the apparent exceptions). As far as I can see, those publishers remaining on the main site are of two types. There are those whose sales currently meet an arbitrary minimum sales level, and those who have shown a strong and steady increase in sales during their time with RPGnow and exhibit the growth potential to meet that minimum level in a relatively short time. The minimum sales target may well vary from category to category (niche products perhaps not held to the same numbers as mainstream products), but it's still all about sales. The only place quality comes into the equation is in the general tendency for better quality products to get better sales than crappy ones (which is unreliable at best, given that factors like marketing, size of the publisher's catalog, and niche vs mainsteam products, will have far more impact on sales). But the split is not being based (so far as I can tell) directly on quality at all. There will be some products on the Edge that are better quality than some products on the main site, and the reverse will also be true. Any claim that a publisher's presense on the main site is somehow a guarantee of top quality, or that Edge publishers are necessarily of lower quality, is simply false. And any perception of such is flawed. That said, there's nothing wrong with using sales as the criteria. It's actually much better than trying to use subjective "quality," since everyone has their own ideas about what constitutes "quality." Whether or not a particular publisher is "quality" cannot be measured objectively. How well their products sell can be. So, that's my 2 cents. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
RPGNow Expanding...
Top