Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
rule question: dual-implement spellcaster
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stonegod" data-source="post: 5129359" data-attributes="member: 36973"><p>And bards, swordmages, warlocks, and artificers. I actually have an artificer in LEB that has Staff Fighting.A staff is still a weapon (a quarterstaff) so they gain the defensive bonus from just holding it (it doesn't come to play into powers). The question is if being a double <strong>weapon</strong> means becoming a double <em>implement</em>. They reason swordmages benefit from DIS from a double sword is they they have blades as implements (the weapon is treated as an implement). The issue is not symmetric: Staffs are implements first, weapons second (as per my quote from PH3 209 in the PH3).</p><p>I'm not sure what the question is: Monks use staff's as implements (as they use any weapon as an implement). If they took Staff Fighting, they'd get +1 to AC like everyone else (as it is still a weapon).Which is clarified deeper in PH3 (pg. 219). They point out that weapon-implements only count part of their properties when they play in the other's role as I've mentioned before.</p><p></p><p>Staff Fighting turns a quaterstaff into a double weapon. Both sides are part of the staff <strong>weapon group</strong> but they are not both staff implements; the staff weapon group is not the same as the staff implement. This is why swordmages benefit from DIS: They treat items from the light blade and heavy blade weapon groups as implements (and each side of a double sword is treated as such).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stonegod, post: 5129359, member: 36973"] And bards, swordmages, warlocks, and artificers. I actually have an artificer in LEB that has Staff Fighting.A staff is still a weapon (a quarterstaff) so they gain the defensive bonus from just holding it (it doesn't come to play into powers). The question is if being a double [b]weapon[/b] means becoming a double [i]implement[/i]. They reason swordmages benefit from DIS from a double sword is they they have blades as implements (the weapon is treated as an implement). The issue is not symmetric: Staffs are implements first, weapons second (as per my quote from PH3 209 in the PH3). I'm not sure what the question is: Monks use staff's as implements (as they use any weapon as an implement). If they took Staff Fighting, they'd get +1 to AC like everyone else (as it is still a weapon).Which is clarified deeper in PH3 (pg. 219). They point out that weapon-implements only count part of their properties when they play in the other's role as I've mentioned before. Staff Fighting turns a quaterstaff into a double weapon. Both sides are part of the staff [b]weapon group[/b] but they are not both staff implements; the staff weapon group is not the same as the staff implement. This is why swordmages benefit from DIS: They treat items from the light blade and heavy blade weapon groups as implements (and each side of a double sword is treated as such). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
rule question: dual-implement spellcaster
Top