Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
rule question: dual-implement spellcaster
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oni" data-source="post: 5129641" data-attributes="member: 380"><p>Just for the record Dual Implement Spellcaster only works with arcane powers. So while a monk could use a staff of ruin and benefit from its property, they wouldn't be able to use DIS with their monk powers, regardless of how you treat staff fighting. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Regarding the rules and "cheese". Since this is a shared community there is an expectation for the rules to work as they are written, it's the common language we all work with. While I recognize that this particular question isn't necessarily cut in dried in terms of interpretation, just declaring that you wouldn't let it work in your game because it's cheesy isn't really the best way of handling it. The rulings should be based on RAW, and if something is found wanting a proposal should be needed to change it, so that everyone can be on the same page. That said there is also a certain social contract at work here, and players shouldn't try to be deliberately abusive, but others need to realize that not everyone has the same standard when it comes to judging such things and that is why it is important for a community such as ours to work from a standardized baseline.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oni, post: 5129641, member: 380"] Just for the record Dual Implement Spellcaster only works with arcane powers. So while a monk could use a staff of ruin and benefit from its property, they wouldn't be able to use DIS with their monk powers, regardless of how you treat staff fighting. Regarding the rules and "cheese". Since this is a shared community there is an expectation for the rules to work as they are written, it's the common language we all work with. While I recognize that this particular question isn't necessarily cut in dried in terms of interpretation, just declaring that you wouldn't let it work in your game because it's cheesy isn't really the best way of handling it. The rulings should be based on RAW, and if something is found wanting a proposal should be needed to change it, so that everyone can be on the same page. That said there is also a certain social contract at work here, and players shouldn't try to be deliberately abusive, but others need to realize that not everyone has the same standard when it comes to judging such things and that is why it is important for a community such as ours to work from a standardized baseline. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
rule question: dual-implement spellcaster
Top