Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="JEB" data-source="post: 8832955" data-attributes="member: 10148">The only reason there'd be internal discussions is if they do plan to change their stance on the OGL and third-party support from the way it's been for most of 5E's run. Or are at least seriously considering the possibility.If they aren't doing that, a Tweet or two would be all that's needed to dispel the rumors (except among folks who think Wizards is lying, but you can't help them). I mean, they found the time to make a detailed post on D&D canon - something with zero effect on third-party business models - and this would be comparatively simple.They could keep their existing OGL/SRD stance and still have flexibility on D&D Beyond and VTTs; it's not a factor in those policies at this time. (Closest policy they may have is their special support for a few Critical Role rules options on DDB.)</blockquote>