Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Saving Throws
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 6153715" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>Just because the designers are doing it doesn't mean it's necessary <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/erm.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":erm:" title="Erm :erm:" data-shortname=":erm:" /></p><p></p><p>However, I noticed what you wrote before, and now I think we've been arguing over 2 different issues... When you said "One is a 3rd-level novie. The other is a 20th-level archmage. The Fighter will have the same chance of averting both spells?", I was just thinking that DC doesn't have to depend on caster level (or spellcaster class level). In 3ed it didn't depend on that, and it wasn't a big deal*. Even in the case the DC would be always identical for both casters (but in general they are not, because of ability score increases), IMO it's not a big deal, because the higher level caster is still much more powerful. Then monsters abilities have their own DC, so the Dragon's DC is not going to be necessarily low in this system.</p><p></p><p>*basically I thought you were arguing that the same Cause Fear must automatically have a higher DC if cast by a higher level wizard, and I wanted to point out that IMHO that's not necessary; it CAN be done like that, but even if the game makes Cause Fear work identically for both wizards, the game is still fine</p><p></p><p>OTOH I know understand you were directly referring to the announced changes in the podcast, where DC depends on the target. I also don't like that!</p><p></p><p>In general, I don't like that much how in 5e every spellcaster has this level-based DC bonus, it's one more fiddly bit to keep track of. Then I expected they would introduce once again a 3e-style saving throws progression, which is 3 more fiddly bits (or maybe 6)... But DC based on the target is even worse, and as you say it might lead to high level monsters to be easier to save against, so how they will fix this? But of course, by giving each monster's ability a "this requires a save at -X", so once again fiddly bits!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 6153715, member: 1465"] Just because the designers are doing it doesn't mean it's necessary :erm: However, I noticed what you wrote before, and now I think we've been arguing over 2 different issues... When you said "One is a 3rd-level novie. The other is a 20th-level archmage. The Fighter will have the same chance of averting both spells?", I was just thinking that DC doesn't have to depend on caster level (or spellcaster class level). In 3ed it didn't depend on that, and it wasn't a big deal*. Even in the case the DC would be always identical for both casters (but in general they are not, because of ability score increases), IMO it's not a big deal, because the higher level caster is still much more powerful. Then monsters abilities have their own DC, so the Dragon's DC is not going to be necessarily low in this system. *basically I thought you were arguing that the same Cause Fear must automatically have a higher DC if cast by a higher level wizard, and I wanted to point out that IMHO that's not necessary; it CAN be done like that, but even if the game makes Cause Fear work identically for both wizards, the game is still fine OTOH I know understand you were directly referring to the announced changes in the podcast, where DC depends on the target. I also don't like that! In general, I don't like that much how in 5e every spellcaster has this level-based DC bonus, it's one more fiddly bit to keep track of. Then I expected they would introduce once again a 3e-style saving throws progression, which is 3 more fiddly bits (or maybe 6)... But DC based on the target is even worse, and as you say it might lead to high level monsters to be easier to save against, so how they will fix this? But of course, by giving each monster's ability a "this requires a save at -X", so once again fiddly bits! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Saving Throws
Top