Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Burticusb" data-source="post: 6753691" data-attributes="member: 6791242">I'm cool with the ruling, but in general, the ruling of this material is valid for this session vs that session, seems a bit more complicated than it is worth.I mean, most of the options present in the SCAG are fluff based at best to get players more into role-playing.These rules feel more exclusive than inclusive just in nature, and that feels opposite of what the Adventurer's League is all about.I understand that their existence is mostly due to trying to curb those who will try to break the game or power game.However, really, this reminds me so much of an old saying...Door locks are really only there to keep out the honest folk, those who want to break in will get in either way.Basically, power gamers are gonna power game, with or without these restrictions.I just think these extra rules on top of rules are a bit silly, and really feel only in place to arbitrate the power of those in charge...There really shouldn't be restrictions from one book to the next, If WoTC produces it, it should be considered "Legal" for play.I mean, they test all this stuff a head of time, and sure somethings may be unbalanced in the right build, but that's just the way it is...Just my 2cp worth...</blockquote>