Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Burticusb" data-source="post: 6753824" data-attributes="member: 6791242">And let's look at how the responses have come to this point... nothing.There are zero arguments that hold any light as to a real good reason as to why there is this ruling....other than our "top" men looked into this and made such and such call.I'm not really that upset with the ruling itself, just that there are zero grounds to base it upon.This is Dungeons & Dragons folks... and the company responsible for it's current iteration just came out with an "official" rulebook.And we are now going to say, well, you can use either this book or this other one, but you can't use both... Again, I can understand the ruling on specific things, like Tieflings with wings... but to say it's all or nothing, for no reason whatsoever...That just seems silly... and non-inclusive.We want to attract new players into this hobby, not push them away because they purchased the "wrong" book...Yes, we can all play however we want in our home games, but Adventurer's League was created to get new folks into the hobby(WoTC Advertising scheme if you will)...This just feels like a large step back from that goal...And thus, it is silly...</blockquote>