Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
[Sci Fi Channel] "Who Wants To Be A Superhero?"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Felon" data-source="post: 2997323" data-attributes="member: 8158"><p>Right, and there's never been any issues regarding the authenticity of events in Survivor heh.  </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nothing you proposed sounds impossible, or even implausible. It's actually much easier just to have talent agencies send over actors than it is to coordinate auditions for applicants from around the world.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The availability of real people to star in the show isn't really the issue. The issue is desirability. A scripted show is just easier to do; less risky to produce, and easier to sell to a network. It certainly helps convince Sci-Fi to give the winner a starring role in a movie (although having seen some of Sci-Fi Channel's Saturday night movies, maybe that ain't such a big deal).</p><p></p><p>Having said that, I certainly don't think every little line or event goes according to a script. For instance, the crying little girl was definitely a surprise for some and not so much for others. But a lot of the reactions, like the teary-eyed emoting during the elimination process? Pure ham--they're trying to show what great actors they are, and are willing to do multiple takes to do so. And I'm fairly suspicious about the likelyhood that they're having direct one-on-one conversations with Stan by closed-circuit TV, with Stan always using perfectly chosen words with never a stumble or moment of hesitation. Stan's eloquent, but he's not that flawless a speaker (nobody is). A lot of that's edited in.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You're off on some completely other tangent. Fault doesn't enter into anything I've said.</p><p></p><p>Sorry, but some of you guys seem a tad adamant in your defense of a show that's not really under attack. I'm hardly panning it. I enjoy it quite a bit, but I also know what is. I don't entertain illusions that Stan really picked Iron Enforcer out of all those applicants for his fine heroic qualities, that IE was given a perfectly fair shot in each challenge, and that it's only in light of IE"s constant failures (such as easily making it across the yard, then falling down and crying "uncle" within reach of the door) that it occurred to Stan to make Iron Enforcer a villain. Then again, maybe he was equally prepared to create a Dark Cell Phone Girl, right?  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Felon, post: 2997323, member: 8158"] Right, and there's never been any issues regarding the authenticity of events in Survivor heh. Nothing you proposed sounds impossible, or even implausible. It's actually much easier just to have talent agencies send over actors than it is to coordinate auditions for applicants from around the world. The availability of real people to star in the show isn't really the issue. The issue is desirability. A scripted show is just easier to do; less risky to produce, and easier to sell to a network. It certainly helps convince Sci-Fi to give the winner a starring role in a movie (although having seen some of Sci-Fi Channel's Saturday night movies, maybe that ain't such a big deal). Having said that, I certainly don't think every little line or event goes according to a script. For instance, the crying little girl was definitely a surprise for some and not so much for others. But a lot of the reactions, like the teary-eyed emoting during the elimination process? Pure ham--they're trying to show what great actors they are, and are willing to do multiple takes to do so. And I'm fairly suspicious about the likelyhood that they're having direct one-on-one conversations with Stan by closed-circuit TV, with Stan always using perfectly chosen words with never a stumble or moment of hesitation. Stan's eloquent, but he's not that flawless a speaker (nobody is). A lot of that's edited in. You're off on some completely other tangent. Fault doesn't enter into anything I've said. Sorry, but some of you guys seem a tad adamant in your defense of a show that's not really under attack. I'm hardly panning it. I enjoy it quite a bit, but I also know what is. I don't entertain illusions that Stan really picked Iron Enforcer out of all those applicants for his fine heroic qualities, that IE was given a perfectly fair shot in each challenge, and that it's only in light of IE"s constant failures (such as easily making it across the yard, then falling down and crying "uncle" within reach of the door) that it occurred to Stan to make Iron Enforcer a villain. Then again, maybe he was equally prepared to create a Dark Cell Phone Girl, right? :D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
[Sci Fi Channel] "Who Wants To Be A Superhero?"
Top