Vocenoctum said:
How you feel is only up to you, but..
I wonder if people actually LOOKED at the subscriber only section that they felt ripped off not getting?
I mean, last issue was a reprint of an old adventure (chasm bridge or whatever) updated to 3.5
I didn't mind, it was a neat bonus, but I can't see paying for it.
KenM said:
People that buy Dungeon in a store will now get the same magazine that subsribers get. They have been putting in "subscriber only adventures", this made alot of people that did not subscribe mad that they were not getting the whole magazine. This is a good change, now that they are getting rid of subscriber only stuff.
nikolai said:... is there any sensible reason for the split sides? Isn't is just there because there used to be two magazines? Does it serve any useful purpose? .... The "split" presentation seems to me to be a silly presentational gimmick.
Originally posted by Vaxalon
I only used the Poly content, and I could keep them Poly-side-up.
Brisk-sg said:... No longer include extra pages in the "poly months" .... Increase the page count in the "poly months" ....
Vaxalon said:
What is a "poly month"?
Brisk-sg said:If it is going to decrease, does Paizo have a plan to address subscribers who feel that they are not getting what they agreed to pay for?
KenM said:One question, did Erik say what issue these changes would be in place by?