Kramodlog
Naked and living in a barrel
No, it started by using soiled seringe in vaccination campaigns in the Democratic Repulbic of Congo.
Second baby cured of AIDS
- Thread starter Kramodlog
- Start date
Incorrect. From 2004-2008, some 7,900 cases of cancer in men were linked to HPV in the USA. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_papillomavirus#Cancer
Rates may be lower in Canada just due to the smaller population, and you get to determine your own level of risk tolerance, of course. But note that the rates in a population are directly impacted by the precautions taken by that population. It doesn't take a high rate of failure to protect to greatly increase infection rates. The more folks think like you, the faster it will become an untenable position.
But, even if you were immune, how selfish is that? You can give it to the lady. Here, have some sex... and maybe warts or cancer!
Zombie_Babies
First Post
Ugh, let's be fair here. If a woman decides to have unprotected sex she's taking the same risks the guy is. It's not like goldo is forcing the ladies he parties with to go raw, it's a mutual decision and both parties bear responsibility for what happens.
Basically it may not be the nicest decision but the gal does have some say in her amount of risk. Actually, she has all the say she needs.
Kramodlog
Naked and living in a barrel
When awake, that is correct.
Kramodlog
Naked and living in a barrel
Well I'll be
Sex ed too.
My evil holds no bounds.
It is not like I'm forcing anyone to do it.
In theory. In practice, it doesn't seem to have led to you taking protective steps, now has it?
No. But is, "It wasn't like I forced anyone," really a shining endorsement? How about, "I did the bare minimum of what was ethically required."? Is that something remarkable? Something to think well on people for?
Kramodlog
Naked and living in a barrel
Because I use critical thinking and went beyond the line "unprotected sex is always bad".
Looking at the stats and the demographics, which are very surprising up here, at some point I understood that smoking, drinking, driving and crossing the streets are more dangerous for me than unprotected sex.
But if you prefere a more black and white approach: *ahem* unprotected sex is bad, drugs are bad, do not cross the street on a red light, strangers only want to do you harm...
Why is it not ethical? Seems you have a patriarchal view and see women as vulnerable, victims, who need to be taken care of or protected.
They were adults who know what they were doing. I had a few say they wouldn't do it, others who suggested it themselves. They were not victims. Women can take care of themselves, let me asure you.
I did, I gave them lots of pleasure.
To the vector belongs the spoils...
Kramodlog
Naked and living in a barrel
A bit like driving a car and accidents. But with better odds.
Similar Threads
