Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Secure Skill (New Skill-Based Feat)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Al" data-source="post: 57654" data-attributes="member: 2486"><p>I've lurked and posted quite a bit, but this is the first original feat I've made so be gentle...</p><p></p><p>Secure Skill [General]</p><p>Prereqs: Skill Focus in the appropriate skill, 8 or more ranks in the appropriate skill.</p><p>Benefit: If the character rolls a score of 9 or less when making a skill check, he can opt to take 10 retroactively instead. It has no effect when the initial roll is 10 or greater.</p><p>Example: Jim the Rogue is using his Disable Device skill, and believes he needs a 12 to disarm the trap. He cannot take 10, and rolls as normal. Disastrously, he rolls a 3. Under normal circumstances he would trigger the trap, but he uses the Secure Skill to count as having rolled 10: the trap is still active, but not triggered.</p><p>Special: The character may not use the Secure Skill under circumstances where he cannot take 10, such as opposed rolls and when distracted. If he has the ability Skill Mastery (such as a high-level rogue) this limitation is removed.</p><p>Normal: A character may choose to take 10 OR roll a d20, the result of which he must take.</p><p></p><p>Before you scream too powerful, a bit of statistics.</p><p>Normally, by rolling d20, the average roll is 10.5.</p><p>Using this feat, the average is increased to 12.75 (work it through using expectational algebra: the average of 11x10+11-20 is 12.75 I think)</p><p>So in terms of sheer increase, it's not much better than Skill Focus. And of course having SF as a prerequisite adds an impetus for people to take SF in the first place, rather than the myriad of feats which give a +2 to two skills.</p><p>It struck me initially as useful for professional types, who want to make a good attempt of a particularly outstanding job without having to take 20 (which may not be available) or take a big risk, but it's useful for adventurers as well.</p><p></p><p>Comments?</p><p>Too boring?</p><p>Too powerful?</p><p>Too weak?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Al, post: 57654, member: 2486"] I've lurked and posted quite a bit, but this is the first original feat I've made so be gentle... Secure Skill [General] Prereqs: Skill Focus in the appropriate skill, 8 or more ranks in the appropriate skill. Benefit: If the character rolls a score of 9 or less when making a skill check, he can opt to take 10 retroactively instead. It has no effect when the initial roll is 10 or greater. Example: Jim the Rogue is using his Disable Device skill, and believes he needs a 12 to disarm the trap. He cannot take 10, and rolls as normal. Disastrously, he rolls a 3. Under normal circumstances he would trigger the trap, but he uses the Secure Skill to count as having rolled 10: the trap is still active, but not triggered. Special: The character may not use the Secure Skill under circumstances where he cannot take 10, such as opposed rolls and when distracted. If he has the ability Skill Mastery (such as a high-level rogue) this limitation is removed. Normal: A character may choose to take 10 OR roll a d20, the result of which he must take. Before you scream too powerful, a bit of statistics. Normally, by rolling d20, the average roll is 10.5. Using this feat, the average is increased to 12.75 (work it through using expectational algebra: the average of 11x10+11-20 is 12.75 I think) So in terms of sheer increase, it's not much better than Skill Focus. And of course having SF as a prerequisite adds an impetus for people to take SF in the first place, rather than the myriad of feats which give a +2 to two skills. It struck me initially as useful for professional types, who want to make a good attempt of a particularly outstanding job without having to take 20 (which may not be available) or take a big risk, but it's useful for adventurers as well. Comments? Too boring? Too powerful? Too weak? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Secure Skill (New Skill-Based Feat)
Top