HeapThaumaturgist said:Personally, "it just couldn't be like that". I.E. either the technology exists to terraform even wildly inappropriate stellar bodies and make them utterly Earthlike ... where-upon the whole wild-west "Ain't got nunthat fancy Tech No Lo Gee here, ayup." doesn't fly. (You don't spend seventy-bazillion dollars to add gravity and an atmo to a moon then toss people with sheep and some hatchets on there. And if tech is so advanced it's cheap to do, then there's no REASON people should be so tech poor. Building hatchets would probably be MORE expensive than graviton lasers and insta-housing.)
--fje
http://chud.com/interviews/980"Are the planets really close together?
Joss: They're really close together. You've never seen a planet cluster like this one. It's a little planet village. If you start asking me science questions I'm going to cry.
Vyvyan Basterd said:You want "wild west high tech" play Star Wars.
Rhun said:Regardless of whether it is plausible or not, it is canon from the setting. In the pilot episode, Zoe mentions that terraforming includes setting the gravity as close to Earth-That-Was as possible. You may not like it, but if you are going to play Firefly it is part of the setting.
Simon W said:That's right - its no point debating it, you either accept it as part of the setting and move on, or you don't play Serenity/Firefly at all and you go back to some other implausible Star Wars/Star Trek/Farscape/Starship Troopers science fiction setting instead.
trancejeremy said:I think his point was they were all equally unplausible.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.