• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Sexy mutant for X-men 3?


log in or register to remove this ad

Brother Shatterstone said:
Okay either Ratner wanted it and they said, "sure we got that" or maybe Ratner does have a clue when it comes to the X-men. :)

I think its pretty obvious that Ratner wanted it and they said, "sure we got that."

If Ratner knew anything about Marvel comics, he would have said he wanted the Enchantress or Sersi in the movie.

Nobody would pick Stacy for an Xmen movie. I doubt she is even in the top 50 xmen.
 

Joshua Dyal said:
Of course. If anyone made an announcement about X3 without saying they had a bad feeling about it, the world would probably fly straight into the sun.

Oh, hush. :) It's completely possible to say something bad about a comic-book movie for reasons other than being a raving fanboy who has fallen to the dark side and now must mock everything for not being as good as I could have done it.

I'm not really worried about this news, though. This feels more like a PR guys testing the waters or trying to come up with something to say about X3 this week than a real important story element. I see this as a cameo appearance at best, and yeah, it's in there for the sexyness, but it's not going to take up much screen time with silly titillation. If there's a "bad stuff happening to mutants" montage, this will be one short scenelet in the montage. Or two clandestine people will meet in the brothel and have a short chat with the sexy mutant before starting their "So, Magneto is going to blah blah blah and the X-Men are going to blah blah blah operative conversation."

It would be like a press release saying that the Beast was going to be in X2 -- technically true, as his character had, what five seconds of screen time during a fictional equivalent of crossfire, but hardly worth getting worked up about.
 


Personally, I think they should use the Hellfire club. Black Queen, White Queen, Black King, White King as the villains.
 

Brother Shatterstone said:
Maybe it’s just me but I think Cummings did such a wonderful job as Nightcrawler that I would rather they shelve the character than have someone else try to follow up.
and I could understand no wanting to go through all the make up and what not... Its not something I would want to do myself.

I agrre I think he did an awsome job as Nightcrawler. About the make-up thing though I am one the fence. Rebecca goes through alot more than he did, so part of me is 'suck it up', But I also can see it being a hassle and not wanting to put yourself through that.
 

Taelorn76 said:
Rebecca goes through alot more than he did, so part of me is 'suck it up', But I also can see it being a hassle and not wanting to put yourself through that.

Yes, but some people are claustrophobic and others are not... I know it seems silly that make up could do such a thing to a person but you hear about a lot of actors who cannot do it.
 


The series was already ruined in X-men. I mean c'mon people Iceman belongs on the main team! HE WAS ONE OF THE ORIGINAL X-MEN. GET IT RIGHT!!!!
 

warlord said:
The series was already ruined in X-men. I mean c'mon people Iceman belongs on the main team! HE WAS ONE OF THE ORIGINAL X-MEN. GET IT RIGHT!!!!
So too were the Beast and Angel, but I don't see more people rooting for them. Besides, the X-Men comic book series only got more interesting when Wolverine (formerly of Alpha Flight) and Storm joined the team, though there were also forgetteble team members like an Irishman called Banshee.
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top