• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Sexy mutant for X-men 3?

Tauric said:
I don't know if anyone else noticed, but when Mystique accessed the computer files in X2, there was what looked like an x-ray of a winged mutant, and I think the name Archangel was one of the files.

Either way, I like Angel, and think he would be a good addition.

Venus/Serena as pheromone mutant? That I really don't like the sound of.

I am glad that they got Daniel Cudmore back. I love X2 "I can help you."

The wing x-ray was on the wall in the lab when Wolverine and Lady Deathstrike (the Asian woman) fought

the computer feaured a whole list of names of various mutants and 'projects' - including the reference to the Sentinels (giant mutant-hunting robots for the unitiated)

and of course Dr Hank McCoy (Beast) was the expert being interviewed about mutants on TV

Beast, Collosus and Kitty are my favourite X-Men so I'd love to see them get more screen time. I'm also wondering what they're going to do with Pyro (I liked the way they had him go to the dark side in X-2 *again for the unitiated [sblock]he's the one with the fire powers that went with magneto[/sblock])
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

Tonguez said:
The wing x-ray was the on the wall in the lab when Wolverine and Lady Deathstrike (the Asian women) fought

I've looked at this closesly, and I don't believe its ACTUALLY a wing. Instead, I think its just Lady Deathstrike's hand.
 

Well Beast has been confirmed to be in X3. Kelsey Grammer is going to play him. Big, furry, blue him. Also I doubt Angel will appear in X3 because the wing x-ray in X2 was the start of the wings for Angel but they cost too much money to finish.
 

I don't buy that its metal winged Archangel in this movie(at least, not at the start), since they're actually calling him Angel. If it was meal wings, they'd be calling him Archangel...but if they actually DO mean Archangel, then that's just another strike against the movie right there.

I'd prefer to give this as much of the benefit of the doubt as possible at this point.
 



Brother Shatterstone said:
What? Does the truth hurt to much? :lol:
Damn right it does. I didn't wait this long to finally see Angel and have them start screwing up names of characters...if THAT happens, then I finally join the anti-Ratner crowd. Not that I'm really all for Ratner, but no one can really live up to what Singer's set up IMO.
 

Ankh-Morpork Guard said:
but no one can really live up to what Singer's set up IMO.
How odd. I think there's plenty of room for improvement in the X-franchise. The first two movies were decent for comic book movies, but they weren't even in the same league as the Spider-man films or Batman Begins. Singer did all right, and another director could certainly do worse. But (s)he could also do better.
Hijinks said:
Sorry for the XMen n00b question but: Who is Kitty Pryde?
Everything you ever wanted to know about Kitty Pryde.
 

Lord Pendragon said:
How odd. I think there's plenty of room for improvement in the X-franchise. The first two movies were decent for comic book movies, but they weren't even in the same league as the Spider-man films or Batman Begins. Singer did all right, and another director could certainly do worse. But (s)he could also do better.

Its all a matter of trust, really. Singer knew what he was doing, and that was quickly apparent during the first X-Men movie even if it wasn't perfect. It was still X-Men, and it was a damn good movie.

But handing off the movie to a new director is always going to be a thing for some question, not just in X-Men.
 

Ankh-Morpork Guard said:
Its all a matter of trust, really. Singer knew what he was doing, and that was quickly apparent during the first X-Men movie even if it wasn't perfect. It was still X-Men, and it was a damn good movie.

To be honest it was fair… Its not even in the top five, maybe ten, comic book movies of all time. (IMHO)
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top