Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="barsoomcore" data-source="post: 411427" data-attributes="member: 812">Re: Re: Re: Re: Yeah, but...No, they're not. Mark Chance can offer reasons for his opinion. You cannot. Mark Chance has an opinion on the quality of a single campaign. It is possible that he has investigated this campaign enough that he can make an informed opinion. The same is not true of your opinion, I am afraid. Your opinion is less valid because you cannot support it. For your opinion to have ANY value you would have had to investigated EVERY alternative. You clearly have not done so, and so your opinion is making you look foolish. Mark's opinion will only make him look foolish if it becomes known that he does not have enough information to be justified.I am amused that you think this is the issue. I'll just point out that ignoring people's arguments and focussing on petty details is yet another way to get people to stop paying attention to you.I, too, dub thee troll. Begone.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="barsoomcore, post: 411427, member: 812"] [b]Re: Re: Re: Re: Yeah, but...[/b] No, they're not. Mark Chance can offer reasons for his opinion. You cannot. Mark Chance has an opinion on the quality of a single campaign. It is possible that he has investigated this campaign enough that he can make an informed opinion. The same is not true of your opinion, I am afraid. Your opinion is less valid because you cannot support it. For your opinion to have ANY value you would have had to investigated EVERY alternative. You clearly have not done so, and so your opinion is making you look foolish. Mark's opinion will only make him look foolish if it becomes known that he does not have enough information to be justified. I am amused that you think this is the issue. I'll just point out that ignoring people's arguments and focussing on petty details is yet another way to get people to stop paying attention to you. I, too, dub thee troll. Begone. [/QUOTE]

Verification