D&D General Should a low level character know to burn a troll?

Should a low level character know to burn a troll?

  • Yes

    Votes: 86 78.9%
  • No

    Votes: 23 21.1%

FrogReaver

As long as i get to be the frog
Nobody made even the slightest suggestion that you are required to answer. You made a comment about passive-aggressiveness. I described how I wasn't being so. That's it. There's nothing else there, dude.

You don't want to answer, that's fine. You could even stop responding entirely - that'd be okay too.

Nice attempt to blame me for something I never did. I never claimed you were being passive aggressive (I would have been kicked from the thread by now if I had). Heck, I didn't even imply it. It wasn't me that made a comment about passive-aggressiveness. It was you. My comment was about something else entirely and I have no idea why you responded to me by trying to claim you weren't passive aggressive. Maybe it was a guilty conscious or maybe you misread me, I really don't know.

Anyways, stopping to respond to someone entirely isn't my style. You're welcome to not respond to me though.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Campbell

Relaxed Intensity
I do not think it is possible to meaningfully separate player and character knowledge. I think you can play against your knowledge to either engage in dramatic irony or to be a good sport and let the GM have their fun, but that is not like separating player and character knowledge. You are very much acting on the knowledge you have as a player to act against it.
 

FrogReaver

As long as i get to be the frog
I do not think it is possible to meaningfully separate player and character knowledge. I think you can play against your knowledge to either engage in dramatic irony or to be a good sport and let the GM have their fun, but that is not like separating player and character knowledge. You are very much acting on the knowledge you have as a player to act against it.

You've got my vote!
 

Umbran

Mod Squad
Staff member
Supporter
I never claimed you were being passive aggressive

Okay. I didn't say you did, so we seem to be on the same page there.

Is there a reason to continue this?

(I would have been kicked from the thread by now if I had).

Unlikely. For one thing, I generally put up with a lot of nonsense aimed at me, personally. For another, it typically takes more than a single minor incident to get a threadban. If you had established a pattern of treating people poorly in other ways, for example, such a thing might prove to be a final straw; but alone, would not usually be considered enough to be booted from the thread. As evidenced by how we have only handed out a couple of threadbans since the site was upgraded - they aren't common.

If there's any other moderation misconceptions I can clear up for you, please take it to PM.
 

FrogReaver

As long as i get to be the frog
Okay. I didn't say you did, so we seem to be on the same page there.

Is there a reason to continue this?



Unlikely. For one thing, I generally put up with a lot of nonsense aimed at me, personally. For another, it typically takes more than a single minor incident to get a threadban. If you had established a pattern of treating people poorly in other ways, for example, such a thing might prove to be a final straw; but alone, would not usually be considered enough to be booted from the thread. As evidenced by how we have only handed out a couple of threadbans since the site was upgraded - they aren't common.

If there's any other moderation misconceptions I can clear up for you, please take it to PM.

Well there's one last thing for me, I am very curious as to why you told me you weren't being passive aggressive since I never claimed you were.
 



In most cases where a character's backstory didn't include a reason for them to specifically know something I would say a DM approved skill should be used for a knowledge check with the DC varying depending on the rarity of said monster and the character's backstory.
 


Remove ads

Top