'One book' seems to be leading in the votes right now... but I wonder if that would remain the case if an addendum was added to the question, of "The total price would be the same regardless of the number of books released."?
In other words, are some people voting for 'One book' merely because they assume it would be cheaper to get everything in a single volume, and price matters more to them than any potential gains in ease-of-use that might occur by distributing rules in separate tomes? Maybe, maybe not. Doesn't matter to me either way, but I'd be curious if taking cost out of the equation and making it merely about weight, rules distribution, and organization might produce different results?
Well, it WAS pretty OP as originally published. Get a signature paladin ability for basically a feat slot? That’s too good.The original version of Divine Protection.
View attachment 348273
Sure, it was pretty strong. And it could have been rebalanced. But look at what it was turned into and tell me that anyone would want that.Well, it WAS pretty OP as originally published. Get a signature paladin ability for basically a feat slot? That’s too good.
I do wish an option for an extensive website like an SRD or Archive of Nethys was included in the poll. That is what I want the most.
That was the STRPG 2e boxed set.I think the old FASA Star Trek boxed set had three books, one for the players, one for the GM and a setting book for Starfleet.
I'd go for the three book model plus one book for extra setting materiels that can be used by all.