Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should all races/lineages have +2/+1/+1 ASI?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mirrorrorrim" data-source="post: 9139174" data-attributes="member: 7040132"><p>Ability score generation is the absolute easiest scalable DM option in the entire game. No one is being left by the wayside in that regard. There isn't a <em>Right Way</em> for ability score generation, because there are so many valid options that really just translate into a very robust sliding scale that works no matter how far you slide it. The impact isn't good or bad, rather it is merely a preference, as it is the primary factor for determining whether PCs have "heroic" or "gritty" power level.</p><p></p><p>The baseline is just what the designers think is balanced, moderate level, which is nothing more than a guideline. If the table disagrees with the designers' determination, it is a very easy fix. They just do something different. No one is doing anything wrong. Heck, I haven't used the PH stat generation options in years. The designers just need the normal 2-3 options with insights/explanations for new players.</p><p></p><p>The classes and subclasses are getting a tiny bit of a boost in D&D24. I think that the baseline ability score generation methods should stay the same as 2014, because if the baseline was just higher numbers, on top of the boosts the classes and subclasses are getting, that's just an even more powerful experience going forward. Let experienced tables do what they've always done, which is decide for themselves, but the game does not have to change to "validate" their preferences. They don't need validation. They know what they are doing. The printed ability score generation methods just need to work well for newbies until they decide how they want to do it themselves.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mirrorrorrim, post: 9139174, member: 7040132"] Ability score generation is the absolute easiest scalable DM option in the entire game. No one is being left by the wayside in that regard. There isn't a [I]Right Way[/I] for ability score generation, because there are so many valid options that really just translate into a very robust sliding scale that works no matter how far you slide it. The impact isn't good or bad, rather it is merely a preference, as it is the primary factor for determining whether PCs have "heroic" or "gritty" power level. The baseline is just what the designers think is balanced, moderate level, which is nothing more than a guideline. If the table disagrees with the designers' determination, it is a very easy fix. They just do something different. No one is doing anything wrong. Heck, I haven't used the PH stat generation options in years. The designers just need the normal 2-3 options with insights/explanations for new players. The classes and subclasses are getting a tiny bit of a boost in D&D24. I think that the baseline ability score generation methods should stay the same as 2014, because if the baseline was just higher numbers, on top of the boosts the classes and subclasses are getting, that's just an even more powerful experience going forward. Let experienced tables do what they've always done, which is decide for themselves, but the game does not have to change to "validate" their preferences. They don't need validation. They know what they are doing. The printed ability score generation methods just need to work well for newbies until they decide how they want to do it themselves. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should all races/lineages have +2/+1/+1 ASI?
Top