Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Fanaelialae" data-source="post: 9152351" data-attributes="member: 53980">They do tell us so in 5e. Unless I'm misremembering, it basically just says that spells don't work in anti-magic zones. If a dragon's ability to fly ought to be impeded the zone, it would say so. Much like you can't force a dragon to land by casting dispel magic.IMCs creatures like elementals, giants, and dragons are inherently magical, allowing them to ignore the physical laws that would make them impossible in the RW. Those types of creatures wouldn't want to spend an extended period of time in an anti-magic zone (and by this, I mean on the scale of months or years) because they'd eventually grow sick and die without ambient magic. But they're able to function in those areas without issues for shorter periods without issues, because they essentially bring magic with them. I'd be fine with a mundane fighter if the class only had something like a 10 level progression, after which you would be expected to take levels in some kind of mythic fighter class. The mythic fighter wouldn't even need to be inherently magical, though I think at least some options ought to be, but could have magic items baked into the class with a removal of attunement restrictions.</blockquote>