Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Remathilis" data-source="post: 9157880" data-attributes="member: 7635">Han got the sneak attack while Vader was distracted by Luke (who was also an excellent pilot.) But all the protagonists (Anakin , Luke, Rey) were excellent pilots, gifted in the Force, and talented warriors. They may be a match in the first movie of their respective trilogies, but come the second and third they are so OP they have to be on separate &quot;Jedi&quot; missions away from their allies. The closest thing to some sort of balanced group is Anakin, Obiwan, and Ashoka, but that's because they were all Jedi. Which loops me back to my point. You get partiality when every character has special abilities of some kind. Harry Potter, for all its warts, made all three protagonists equal in that they were wizards. They didn't stick a muggle on the team and tried to make them useful. D&amp;D needs to do the same and realize that adventuring isn't for muggles and hotshot smugglers, it's for wizards and Jedi.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Remathilis, post: 9157880, member: 7635"] Han got the sneak attack while Vader was distracted by Luke (who was also an excellent pilot.) But all the protagonists (Anakin , Luke, Rey) were excellent pilots, gifted in the Force, and talented warriors. They may be a match in the first movie of their respective trilogies, but come the second and third they are so OP they have to be on separate "Jedi" missions away from their allies. The closest thing to some sort of balanced group is Anakin, Obiwan, and Ashoka, but that's because they were all Jedi. Which loops me back to my point. You get partiality when every character has special abilities of some kind. Harry Potter, for all its warts, made all three protagonists equal in that they were wizards. They didn't stick a muggle on the team and tried to make them useful. D&D needs to do the same and realize that adventuring isn't for muggles and hotshot smugglers, it's for wizards and Jedi. [/QUOTE]

Verification