Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should Ranger/Paladin get 1 level 1 spellslot at 1st level?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 7022593" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>You're not actually "trying" to get paladins and rangers magic at level 1 though. What you're actually doing is just setting up a scenario in order to argue with people. No more, no less.</p><p></p><p>Paladins and rangers could have spells at level 1 in your games <em>right now</em>... just by deciding as the DM to give it to them. And you didn't need to come here on the boards to do that. But instead, you posted the question here on the boards to have a "discussion" about the idea. And yet, whenever someone mentioned why they didn't think it was a good or necessary idea, you argued with them telling them why you think they are wrong.</p><p></p><p>So let's just be honest with what's going on here. You have an opinion that paladins and rangers should have magic at level 1, and you just feel like arguing with people who disagree with you. There's no "discussion" to be had. And people will either choose to engage with you, or choose not to.</p><p></p><p>But if you <strong>really</strong> want to "discuss" it because <em>you aren't actually sure it is a good idea</em>... then it would make a little more sense to not just keep dismissing other people's comments out of hand and actually start finding common ground so you can reach a conclusion that is actual useful to you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 7022593, member: 7006"] You're not actually "trying" to get paladins and rangers magic at level 1 though. What you're actually doing is just setting up a scenario in order to argue with people. No more, no less. Paladins and rangers could have spells at level 1 in your games [I]right now[/I]... just by deciding as the DM to give it to them. And you didn't need to come here on the boards to do that. But instead, you posted the question here on the boards to have a "discussion" about the idea. And yet, whenever someone mentioned why they didn't think it was a good or necessary idea, you argued with them telling them why you think they are wrong. So let's just be honest with what's going on here. You have an opinion that paladins and rangers should have magic at level 1, and you just feel like arguing with people who disagree with you. There's no "discussion" to be had. And people will either choose to engage with you, or choose not to. But if you [B]really[/B] want to "discuss" it because [I]you aren't actually sure it is a good idea[/I]... then it would make a little more sense to not just keep dismissing other people's comments out of hand and actually start finding common ground so you can reach a conclusion that is actual useful to you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Should Ranger/Paladin get 1 level 1 spellslot at 1st level?
Top