Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sigil and the Outlands has Planar Rules
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Veltharis ap Rylix" data-source="post: 9039791" data-attributes="member: 66357"><p>Ardlings already had a built-in tie to the planes - they were designed with three "subrace" options to emphasize ties to LG, NG, and CG planes mirroring the new version of tiefling (perhaps the single most iconic Planescape race) and their options to emphasize ties to LE, NE, and CE planes.</p><p></p><p>The second pass revision to the Ardling didn't make them "more planar", it refocused them to be almost purely a representation of "animal person", with the ties to the Beastlands basically filling in as a default explanation for why they can represent any type of animal person rather than having separate species statblocks for each a la tabaxi, aarakocra, etc.</p><p></p><p>They went from representing a new type of broad-ranging celestial planetouched to being very specifically a unified anthropomorphic animal framework. That's not a problem, by any means - though I will admit to liking the ardling more as the former than as the latter - but the two fill different conceptual roles. Moreover, moving the ardling toward "animal person" ends up leaving the big "celestial planetouched" hole they had seemingly wanted the ardling to fill distinctly empty, so it's no longer serving the purpose it was initially created to serve.</p><p></p><p>I'm not averse to seeing the ardling return, but it still feels like there are some structural issues that need to be worked out, unless they're just ditching the "broad celestial planetouched" aspect entirely.</p><p></p><p>Unrelatedly, eladrin seem to have been more or less gobbled up by the Feywild, so there's no real telling who the big-time CG outsiders on Arborea are these days...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Veltharis ap Rylix, post: 9039791, member: 66357"] Ardlings already had a built-in tie to the planes - they were designed with three "subrace" options to emphasize ties to LG, NG, and CG planes mirroring the new version of tiefling (perhaps the single most iconic Planescape race) and their options to emphasize ties to LE, NE, and CE planes. The second pass revision to the Ardling didn't make them "more planar", it refocused them to be almost purely a representation of "animal person", with the ties to the Beastlands basically filling in as a default explanation for why they can represent any type of animal person rather than having separate species statblocks for each a la tabaxi, aarakocra, etc. They went from representing a new type of broad-ranging celestial planetouched to being very specifically a unified anthropomorphic animal framework. That's not a problem, by any means - though I will admit to liking the ardling more as the former than as the latter - but the two fill different conceptual roles. Moreover, moving the ardling toward "animal person" ends up leaving the big "celestial planetouched" hole they had seemingly wanted the ardling to fill distinctly empty, so it's no longer serving the purpose it was initially created to serve. I'm not averse to seeing the ardling return, but it still feels like there are some structural issues that need to be worked out, unless they're just ditching the "broad celestial planetouched" aspect entirely. Unrelatedly, eladrin seem to have been more or less gobbled up by the Feywild, so there's no real telling who the big-time CG outsiders on Arborea are these days... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sigil and the Outlands has Planar Rules
Top