Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Silvery Barbs, how would you fix it? Does it need fixing?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Captain Panda" data-source="post: 8495496" data-attributes="member: 6861845"><p>All entirely true. My point was simply that if you focus entirely on the spell at its peak value, a lot of spells can be made to sound far worse than they are. The only reason Silvery Barbs is getting all this negative feedback right now is that it's new. New things get more scrutiny than things in the PHB. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Yep! Now tell that to the people who think this spell is going to replace Shield.</p><p></p><p>Here we run into a problem. If we say the bad guy isn't gonna attack at all due to Silvery Barbs, I think what you really mean is they are going to be encouraged to fail a saving throw with Silvery Barbs. In that case, it's the other spell doing the heavy lift, and that are other ways to lower their odds of success on a safe. Heightened metamagic does it for about the same price, without costing a reaction (and I keep repeating myself, but reactions for casters get more and more valuable as you level up). Eloquence bards can do it with a bonus action and a bardic inspiration, which is cheaper. Divination and Chronurgy wizards both get ways to force things to fail rather than just use a reaction to increase chances of failure.</p><p>I understand it's different, and more versatile because it can also impact ability checks (something I haven't seen mentioned much, but using it immediately to roll higher initiative and then getting the reaction back because you go sooner strikes me as a very solid use of this ability), but each individual use isn't actually that strong unless you use it at a key moment, need is (sometimes they'll fail on their own), and then it actually works (sometimes they'll make it the second time). </p><p></p><p>Quick note, you should only really be using Banishment if the creature you're fighting is extraplanar. Otherwise it's a pretty bad choice of spell I keep seeing get floated here, for some reason. There are lower level spells to disable a single target. </p><p></p><p>Also, one of the benefits of Banishment is that it's a charisma save. It's already going to likely target a weak save. The heavy lifting being done here is being done by Banishment, not Silvery Barbs. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Not really the debate this thread is meant to be focused on, but I don't agree with the notion that is commonly spread that casters are inherently fragile. I also don't agree with the base assumption that wizards being targeted by attacks means they did something wrong. I kind of assume everyone is a target.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Captain Panda, post: 8495496, member: 6861845"] All entirely true. My point was simply that if you focus entirely on the spell at its peak value, a lot of spells can be made to sound far worse than they are. The only reason Silvery Barbs is getting all this negative feedback right now is that it's new. New things get more scrutiny than things in the PHB. Yep! Now tell that to the people who think this spell is going to replace Shield. Here we run into a problem. If we say the bad guy isn't gonna attack at all due to Silvery Barbs, I think what you really mean is they are going to be encouraged to fail a saving throw with Silvery Barbs. In that case, it's the other spell doing the heavy lift, and that are other ways to lower their odds of success on a safe. Heightened metamagic does it for about the same price, without costing a reaction (and I keep repeating myself, but reactions for casters get more and more valuable as you level up). Eloquence bards can do it with a bonus action and a bardic inspiration, which is cheaper. Divination and Chronurgy wizards both get ways to force things to fail rather than just use a reaction to increase chances of failure. I understand it's different, and more versatile because it can also impact ability checks (something I haven't seen mentioned much, but using it immediately to roll higher initiative and then getting the reaction back because you go sooner strikes me as a very solid use of this ability), but each individual use isn't actually that strong unless you use it at a key moment, need is (sometimes they'll fail on their own), and then it actually works (sometimes they'll make it the second time). Quick note, you should only really be using Banishment if the creature you're fighting is extraplanar. Otherwise it's a pretty bad choice of spell I keep seeing get floated here, for some reason. There are lower level spells to disable a single target. Also, one of the benefits of Banishment is that it's a charisma save. It's already going to likely target a weak save. The heavy lifting being done here is being done by Banishment, not Silvery Barbs. Not really the debate this thread is meant to be focused on, but I don't agree with the notion that is commonly spread that casters are inherently fragile. I also don't agree with the base assumption that wizards being targeted by attacks means they did something wrong. I kind of assume everyone is a target. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Silvery Barbs, how would you fix it? Does it need fixing?
Top