Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Silvery Barbs, how would you fix it? Does it need fixing?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Stalker0" data-source="post: 8497591" data-attributes="member: 5889"><p>You have made this assertion multiple times, and I continue to dispute it.</p><p></p><p>Here's a simple table of some standard failure chances:</p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td>Base Failure</td><td>HS Boost</td><td>SB Boost</td><td>SB Boost (by sorcery point)</td><td>HS Boost (by sorcery point)</td></tr><tr><td><p style="text-align: right">0.35</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.2275</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.1225</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.175</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.1925</p> </td></tr><tr><td><p style="text-align: right">0.4</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.24</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.16</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.2</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.213333</p> </td></tr><tr><td><p style="text-align: right">0.45</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.2475</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.2025</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.225</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.2325</p> </td></tr><tr><td><p style="text-align: right">0.5</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.25</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.25</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.25</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.25</p> </td></tr><tr><td><p style="text-align: right">0.55</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.2475</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.3025</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.275</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.265833</p> </td></tr><tr><td><p style="text-align: right">0.6</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.24</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.36</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.3</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.28</p> </td></tr><tr><td><p style="text-align: right">0.65</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.2275</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.4225</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.325</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.2925</p> </td></tr><tr><td><p style="text-align: right">0.7</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.21</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.49</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.35</p> </td><td><p style="text-align: right">0.303333</p> </td></tr></table><p>Column 2: Increase in overall failure rate for using HS</p><p>Column 3: Increase in overall failure rate for using SB</p><p>Column 4: Increase in immediate failure rate by using sorcery points for on SB.</p><p>Column 5: Increase in overall failure rate by using sorcery points on HS</p><p></p><p>What this shows is: If the creature has a low chance of failing, than HS provides a higher boost to failure than SB. But as soon as you go over 50%, SB is superior in overall value.</p><p></p><p>We can also look at this in terms of resource value. Dividing Column 2 by 3 sorcery points gives us the HS per point. With SB, because we only choose to spend the resource after getting an initial result, when we spend it we get the base failure rate all over again, divided by 2 points.</p><p></p><p>So once again, once saves are over 50%, SB is superior to HS. Both in total failure boost, and in boost per resource spent.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Now we can debate when each one is better, and that's a reasonable debate. But this assertion that HS is always statistically superior to SB is completely false.</p><p></p><p>As for whether HS is not a common choice for sorcs, keep in mind its high cost in sorcery points is a major factor, and it has to compete with abilities like quicken. SB is the cheapest spell resource there is.</p><p></p><p>I also continue to assert, that the fact we are even comparing a 1st level spell to major class features is a point in the "possibly OP camp". When a wizard can do what makes a sorc special with a 1st level spell....that should be cause for concern.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Stalker0, post: 8497591, member: 5889"] You have made this assertion multiple times, and I continue to dispute it. Here's a simple table of some standard failure chances: [TABLE] [TR] [TD]Base Failure[/TD] [TD]HS Boost[/TD] [TD]SB Boost[/TD] [TD]SB Boost (by sorcery point)[/TD] [TD]HS Boost (by sorcery point)[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][RIGHT]0.35[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.2275[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.1225[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.175[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.1925[/RIGHT][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][RIGHT]0.4[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.24[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.16[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.2[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.213333[/RIGHT][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][RIGHT]0.45[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.2475[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.2025[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.225[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.2325[/RIGHT][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][RIGHT]0.5[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.25[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.25[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.25[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.25[/RIGHT][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][RIGHT]0.55[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.2475[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.3025[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.275[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.265833[/RIGHT][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][RIGHT]0.6[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.24[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.36[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.3[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.28[/RIGHT][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][RIGHT]0.65[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.2275[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.4225[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.325[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.2925[/RIGHT][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][RIGHT]0.7[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.21[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.49[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.35[/RIGHT][/TD] [TD][RIGHT]0.303333[/RIGHT][/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] Column 2: Increase in overall failure rate for using HS Column 3: Increase in overall failure rate for using SB Column 4: Increase in immediate failure rate by using sorcery points for on SB. Column 5: Increase in overall failure rate by using sorcery points on HS What this shows is: If the creature has a low chance of failing, than HS provides a higher boost to failure than SB. But as soon as you go over 50%, SB is superior in overall value. We can also look at this in terms of resource value. Dividing Column 2 by 3 sorcery points gives us the HS per point. With SB, because we only choose to spend the resource after getting an initial result, when we spend it we get the base failure rate all over again, divided by 2 points. So once again, once saves are over 50%, SB is superior to HS. Both in total failure boost, and in boost per resource spent. Now we can debate when each one is better, and that's a reasonable debate. But this assertion that HS is always statistically superior to SB is completely false. As for whether HS is not a common choice for sorcs, keep in mind its high cost in sorcery points is a major factor, and it has to compete with abilities like quicken. SB is the cheapest spell resource there is. I also continue to assert, that the fact we are even comparing a 1st level spell to major class features is a point in the "possibly OP camp". When a wizard can do what makes a sorc special with a 1st level spell....that should be cause for concern. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Silvery Barbs, how would you fix it? Does it need fixing?
Top