Enforcer said:I thought it was a fun, fast-paced read. The printed version of a decent action/thriller movie. The controversy can be best summed up by Jon Stewart of the Daily Show: "IT'S IN THE FICTION SECTION!!!"
That defense doesn't sit well with me. I, at least, can tell the difference between an author trying to cleverly cite fictional sources to back his fictional claim and an author pushing his own conspiracy theories and doing just enough "But it's all just fiction... isn't it?" winking to defend against charges of slander. Brown is doing the latter, both in the "here's where I justify my bull" exposition parts and in the little foreward note where (no book in front of me) he essentially says that the story itself is fake but makes a vague but implicating statement saying that the organizations and much of the stuff he cites is real.
It's the difference between me writing a story in which a guy with the ENWorld Handle "Enforcer" turns out to be a child-abusing terrorist in the Chicago area who slips poison into birth control pills and firebombs churches in order to spark a war between the pro-life and pro-choice activists and then finishing that story by writing, "Hey, in real life, Enforcer is a great guy. I just used the name. Really, all this stuff is made up, and Enforcer doesn't do anything like this at all," and me writing the exact same story and then noting, "There have been several instances of birth-control-pill-related poisonings and church-bombings in the Chicago area, and a user with the handle 'Enforcer' and a listed location of Chicago does frequent the ENWorld website and make comments related to violent activity, but he has not yet been factually tied to these crimes as he was in this fictional reconstruction of the events."
Both statements are, technically, disclaimers that say that the events in the story are fictional, but the average reader is going to have a slightly different opinion after reading the latter "disclaimer" -- as will the person or organization serving as the big bad enemy in the fictional story. Or do the two disclaimers seem completely the same to you?