Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Blue" data-source="post: 9351982" data-attributes="member: 20564">Look, I have considered blocking you because every single time I engage one of your points not in full agreement, you move the goalposts again and again to avoid admitting you were incorrect.&nbsp; In this case, you claimed &quot;Greyhawk ia getaway full Gazater in Chapter of the new DMG&quot;.&nbsp; This isn't true.&nbsp; Period.I didn't respond to your post because it's so aggravating that you can not take a correction.&nbsp; But when someone else took this and was running with it I had to let them know that we've been told it's the example setting in a create-a-setting chapter, not a Gazetteer chapter, instead of letting the incorrect statement propigate.&nbsp; Yet you can't let it go even though what I said was factually correct.&nbsp; You come up with something true but adjacent to the correction and post it like it counters what I said.Look, you often have good points I like to read, I don't want to block you.&nbsp; But every interaction recently we've had has followed this same, frustrating, tap dance where you are unable to accept a correction if something you posted was incorrect and instead is a dodge to the side.&nbsp; I know, it's the internet, but maybe, just once, accept the correction.&nbsp; Then you can add to it.&nbsp; &quot;Oh, that's right, it's not a chapter devoted to Greyhawk, but I've heard what is there is enough to run.&quot;&nbsp; You're still winning, you have more useful information you added.&nbsp; You're just doing that without having to try to make someone else lose.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Blue, post: 9351982, member: 20564"] Look, I have considered blocking you because [I]every single time[/I] I engage one of your points not in full agreement, you move the goalposts again and again to avoid admitting you were incorrect. In this case, you claimed "Greyhawk ia getaway full Gazater in Chapter of the new DMG". [B]This isn't true.[/B] Period. I didn't respond to your post because it's so aggravating that you can not take a correction. But when someone else took this and was running with it I had to let them know that we've been told it's the example setting in a create-a-setting chapter, not a Gazetteer chapter, instead of letting the incorrect statement propigate. Yet you can't let it go even though what I said was factually correct. You come up with something true but adjacent to the correction and post it like it counters what I said. Look, you often have good points I like to read, I don't want to block you. But every interaction recently we've had has followed this same, frustrating, tap dance where you are unable to accept a correction if something you posted was incorrect and instead is a dodge to the side. I know, it's the internet, but maybe, just once, accept the correction. Then you can add to it. "Oh, that's right, it's not a chapter devoted to Greyhawk, but I've heard what is there is enough to run." You're still winning, you have more useful information you added. You're just doing that without having to try to make someone else lose. [/QUOTE]

Verification