Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="jonesy" data-source="post: 6111219" data-attributes="member: 10324">Reading comprehension fail much? That was exactly my point.The opponents that were faced,the goals they had,the characters that were the protagonists,their goals,the people in the world,the way they lived their lives,the forces aligned against each other in the world,the behaviour of the creatures assigned to be the &quot;monsters&quot;,the general goals of everyone and their ways of achieving them,the general plot lines and their resolutions,the philosophical underpinnings thereof,they were all THE SAME, before and after the shift in focus. The shift that was IN NAME ONLY, because my point is that ONLY the labels were different. Nothing had actually changed in the game itself. Which meant that the morality system wasn't doing what it was supposed to be doing. The fluff was functioning without it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="jonesy, post: 6111219, member: 10324"] Reading comprehension fail much? That was exactly my point. The opponents that were faced, the goals they had, the characters that were the protagonists, their goals, the people in the world, the way they lived their lives, the forces aligned against each other in the world, the behaviour of the creatures assigned to be the "monsters", the general goals of everyone and their ways of achieving them, the general plot lines and their resolutions, the philosophical underpinnings thereof, they were all THE SAME, before and after the shift in focus. The shift that was IN NAME ONLY, because my point is that ONLY the labels were different. Nothing had actually changed in the game itself. Which meant that the morality system wasn't doing what it was supposed to be doing. [I]The fluff was functioning without it[/I]. [/QUOTE]

Verification