Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jester David" data-source="post: 6113788" data-attributes="member: 37579">Sorry.I have offended and upset you and for that I sincerely apologize. That was not my intent. Far too often I see posters saying things that amount to &quot;I dislike &lt;class X&gt; because of &lt;Y&gt; so they should remove that.&quot; It has become a sore spot because not every class can or should appeal to everyone. I was hasty and jumped to the wrong conclusion in my post and for that I am sorry. I agree with you. Earlier I said: I'm strongly in favour of far more clear cut definitions of what is considered a violation. This simultaneously makes playing a paladin narrower and broader. So you could have an Oath to &quot;protect the innocent&quot; with a code about aiding the helpless, not refusing a request for assistance, defending the weak, and the like. Or you could have an Oath for &quot;eradicating the wicked&quot; that might be more focused on not letting an evil creature live, not working with evil creatures, and the like.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jester David, post: 6113788, member: 37579"] Sorry. I have offended and upset you and for that I sincerely apologize. That was not my intent. Far too often I see posters saying things that amount to "I dislike <class X> because of <Y> so they should remove that." It has become a sore spot because not every class can or should appeal to everyone. I was hasty and jumped to the wrong conclusion in my post and for that I am sorry. I agree with you. Earlier I said: I'm strongly in favour of far more clear cut definitions of what is considered a violation. This simultaneously makes playing a paladin narrower and broader. So you could have an Oath to "protect the innocent" with a code about aiding the helpless, not refusing a request for assistance, defending the weak, and the like. Or you could have an Oath for "eradicating the wicked" that might be more focused on not letting an evil creature live, not working with evil creatures, and the like. [/QUOTE]

Verification