So which monstrous character are you gonna play?

Kesh · Feb 13, 2003

Gnoll. Duh.

Dave Blewer · Feb 13, 2003

Hound Archon or a Vrock who has been cursed into a good alignment... Now that would be a difficult character to keep alive!

Robbert Raets · Feb 13, 2003

I've been giving thought to a Dryad Bonsai Monk....

Isida Kep'Tukari · Feb 13, 2003

Robbert Raets said:
I've been giving thought to a Dryad Bonsai Monk....

So, you'd be about three inches tall, tops?

Robbert Raets · Feb 13, 2003

Ray Silver said:
So, you'd be about three inches tall, tops?

Don't get me started.

zyzzyr · Feb 13, 2003

Tarrasque.

or if that's too munchkin

Great Gold Wyrm.

I'd be willing to settle for Titan.

Or a nixie. Any of those four.

Arnwyn · Feb 13, 2003

No monstrous character. And neither will my players.

Sir Osis of Liver · Feb 13, 2003

Put me down for insectile ogre.

http://www.wizards.com/dnd/images/ss_gallery/49124.jpg

Aeolius · Feb 13, 2003

Ashwyn said:
I wanna be an elemental.

Water elemental work for you, then?

Kitha said:
As for me I'd kinda like to play a nymph

One PC in my campaign is a "fiendish fey", offspring of a half-fiend and nymph, her half-brother is the offspring of a half-fiend and nixie.

drdevoid said:
I'd play a symbiotic character...Or maybe a gargoyle:

I have been toying with a few symbiotic team concepts as well, including an awakened strangle weed and sea sprite, an intelligent anemone (anemoid, in my game) and sea elf, and perhaps a kelpie combined with a half-elemental. As for gargoyles, how about a kopoacinth bonded to coral? I have liverock gargoyles, in my game.

Kamikaze Midget said:
I really want to play an ooze at some point too

I have been mulling over the gelatinous template, deciding if it could be used underwater. After all, only a few oozes have been mentioned for use in aquatic settings. I may use the gelatinous template for my jellyfolk, though; envision a race of merfolk whose lower torsos resemble jellyfish.