Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="FrogReaver" data-source="post: 7840049" data-attributes="member: 6795602">Sure but the point is that the maximum power a wizard that's had his spell slots converted to short rest ones can wield per a given rest is much lower overall than a wizard who has more spell slots but recharges them on a long rest.&nbsp; Since the worst case scenario is 1 encounter per ability recover action then the long rest version can wield more power in a single combat.&nbsp; That's the logic behind the notion that short rest conversion can help.Not as bad as you'd think.&nbsp; Though it's more like rocket-tag - and 5e handles rocket-tag combat fairly well IMO.It's not something I'd advocate for - just saying there is a bit of sense behind the basic idea - even if it doesn't pan out after it's carefully examined.&nbsp; By the way - it's almost like you seem to be trying to start a fight about short rest recharge conversion - even with me - when i'm not even advocating for the bad idea.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="FrogReaver, post: 7840049, member: 6795602"] Sure but the point is that the maximum power a wizard that's had his spell slots converted to short rest ones can wield per a given rest is much lower overall than a wizard who has more spell slots but recharges them on a long rest. Since the worst case scenario is 1 encounter per ability recover action then the long rest version can wield more power in a single combat. That's the logic behind the notion that short rest conversion can help. Not as bad as you'd think. Though it's more like rocket-tag - and 5e handles rocket-tag combat fairly well IMO. It's not something I'd advocate for - just saying there is a bit of sense behind the basic idea - even if it doesn't pan out after it's carefully examined. By the way - it's almost like you seem to be trying to start a fight about short rest recharge conversion - even with me - when i'm not even advocating for the bad idea. [/QUOTE]

Verification