Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Some bag of holding questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 3036576" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>It's not an accusation. It's an opinion.</p><p></p><p>The NPC knew a lot about the PCs. The NPC was able to create a special Delay Contingency that fired off an hour later (typically a Research level of magic). The NPC was (presumably) able to cast spells in a Bag of Holding. The NPC was as or more alert in the Bag of Holding than the PCs were out of it. The DM ruled that the NPC could Teleport across a dimensional space and out of the Bag of Holding (even though this is not what he ruled actually happened). When the players brought up a few rules points that were questionable, the DM still ruled in favor of the NPC.</p><p></p><p>This comes under the heading of "Where there is smoke, there is fire.". When stating an opinion, I can use that to sway my position. When stating fact, I cannot.</p><p></p><p>When asked for a fairness <strong>opinion</strong>, I can use whatever data I am given to come up with my opinion. So, my opinion is that this situation falls under the DM caveat of adjudicating in favor of an NPC both in the arena of knowledge of the PCs (given what little information we have on this which is that the NPC was able to do advanced atypical magical tactics) and the mechanics of how magic works, bending a few rules in the process. Such situations tend to raise red flags for me, but might not for others. YMMV.</p><p></p><p>So yes, I can say that. I just happen for find more support for this aspect of my opinion than you do. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> </p><p></p><p>And btw, the DM can do whatever he wants. It's his game. But, I can still give my opinion of the situation and feel quite comfortable that my opinion is perfectly valid: for me, but not necessarily for anyone else. When it comes to fairness opinions, it's a pretty open-ended spectrum.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 3036576, member: 2011"] It's not an accusation. It's an opinion. The NPC knew a lot about the PCs. The NPC was able to create a special Delay Contingency that fired off an hour later (typically a Research level of magic). The NPC was (presumably) able to cast spells in a Bag of Holding. The NPC was as or more alert in the Bag of Holding than the PCs were out of it. The DM ruled that the NPC could Teleport across a dimensional space and out of the Bag of Holding (even though this is not what he ruled actually happened). When the players brought up a few rules points that were questionable, the DM still ruled in favor of the NPC. This comes under the heading of "Where there is smoke, there is fire.". When stating an opinion, I can use that to sway my position. When stating fact, I cannot. When asked for a fairness [b]opinion[/b], I can use whatever data I am given to come up with my opinion. So, my opinion is that this situation falls under the DM caveat of adjudicating in favor of an NPC both in the arena of knowledge of the PCs (given what little information we have on this which is that the NPC was able to do advanced atypical magical tactics) and the mechanics of how magic works, bending a few rules in the process. Such situations tend to raise red flags for me, but might not for others. YMMV. So yes, I can say that. I just happen for find more support for this aspect of my opinion than you do. ;) And btw, the DM can do whatever he wants. It's his game. But, I can still give my opinion of the situation and feel quite comfortable that my opinion is perfectly valid: for me, but not necessarily for anyone else. When it comes to fairness opinions, it's a pretty open-ended spectrum. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Some bag of holding questions
Top