Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
Space combat exploit question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BlckKnght" data-source="post: 7792920" data-attributes="member: 6958254"><p>A bit of a counterpoint, as one of knikpiw's players:</p><p></p><p>I feel System Override is overpowered when you use it to shut down the nearest shield facing immediately before shooting at that side of the enemy ship (other uses of the exploit are fine, or maybe even weak). If the target's main (or only!) SOAK is from their shields, you've just negated it for free, and can keep on doing it again each turn indefinitely (as long as the attacker can beat E-DEFENSE). I think it's much stronger in this role for NPC ships played by the GM, since they take all their actions at once. It's not quite as good for player characters, as their teammates actions will spread out by their initiatives. If the character with the exploit ends up just before the target ship in initiative order, it's mostly useless (since they'll rotate to present a different shield facing before anyone can shoot).</p><p></p><p>But while System Override is often strong, Counterhack seems pretty weak. Mostly it's an issue of how narrow it is, and the opportunity cost of picking it over some other exploit that might apply more often. It only makes sense to pick it as a universal exploit if you know, in advance, that you'll be facing enemies with System Override. But how would you know that? If the enemy knew you were going to have Counterhack, they'd probably pick a different exploit for themselves! I was tempted to take Counterhack when I first created my character (who is very good at computers), but decided not too because I didn't think system override would come up often. Sure enough, it only came up this past session for the first time in our year-long campaign.</p><p></p><p>I suggest that both exploits be generalized. That is, rather than having special unique effects, they should tie in more closely with the normal rules for space combat. Make System Override give a +2d6 to ewar attacks or damage (with maybe the current exploit's effects on a critical hit). Counterhack in turn should let you use a reaction to roll your own ewar attack against anyone who makes one against your ship. The original attack and your counter attack would be opposed rolls, rather than being compared against E-DEFENSE.</p><p></p><p>In general, I hope the space combat rules will get an update at some point, as there are a whole lot of pieces of the system that don't really feel like they work well for small ships. Maybe with Class XII cruisers there's better balance, but space combat in our campaign with a couple of different Class III ships always felt awkward (e.g. either one or both sides struggled to achieve anything in almost ever fight).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BlckKnght, post: 7792920, member: 6958254"] A bit of a counterpoint, as one of knikpiw's players: I feel System Override is overpowered when you use it to shut down the nearest shield facing immediately before shooting at that side of the enemy ship (other uses of the exploit are fine, or maybe even weak). If the target's main (or only!) SOAK is from their shields, you've just negated it for free, and can keep on doing it again each turn indefinitely (as long as the attacker can beat E-DEFENSE). I think it's much stronger in this role for NPC ships played by the GM, since they take all their actions at once. It's not quite as good for player characters, as their teammates actions will spread out by their initiatives. If the character with the exploit ends up just before the target ship in initiative order, it's mostly useless (since they'll rotate to present a different shield facing before anyone can shoot). But while System Override is often strong, Counterhack seems pretty weak. Mostly it's an issue of how narrow it is, and the opportunity cost of picking it over some other exploit that might apply more often. It only makes sense to pick it as a universal exploit if you know, in advance, that you'll be facing enemies with System Override. But how would you know that? If the enemy knew you were going to have Counterhack, they'd probably pick a different exploit for themselves! I was tempted to take Counterhack when I first created my character (who is very good at computers), but decided not too because I didn't think system override would come up often. Sure enough, it only came up this past session for the first time in our year-long campaign. I suggest that both exploits be generalized. That is, rather than having special unique effects, they should tie in more closely with the normal rules for space combat. Make System Override give a +2d6 to ewar attacks or damage (with maybe the current exploit's effects on a critical hit). Counterhack in turn should let you use a reaction to roll your own ewar attack against anyone who makes one against your ship. The original attack and your counter attack would be opposed rolls, rather than being compared against E-DEFENSE. In general, I hope the space combat rules will get an update at some point, as there are a whole lot of pieces of the system that don't really feel like they work well for small ships. Maybe with Class XII cruisers there's better balance, but space combat in our campaign with a couple of different Class III ships always felt awkward (e.g. either one or both sides struggled to achieve anything in almost ever fight). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
Space combat exploit question
Top