Dragongirl said:
If that was the case, would there have been anything they could have done differently?
Let's be clear on something - NASA was well aware of this before re-entry. Right after every launch, they have engineers pour over footage with a fine toothed comb, and the best image enhancement available. Their determination was that there was no sign of notable damage.
That doesn't mean this wasn't the cause. Nor does it mean that the could not have proceeded differently. It does mean that they had no particular reason to proceed differently. The best data they had said it should not have been a problem.
I'll repeat - our curiosity is a heavy thing, but really,
it's too soon to start speculating, especially from our "armchair" positions. NASA hasn't even held it's first news conference on the subject, yet. We know nothing. Let's not fill the air with little bits of this nothing.
[edit: btw, CNN claims the 1st news conference will be at 1PM, EST]
[edit: space.com is is not an official NASA site. There are people there with connections, though]