I'm A Banana
Potassium-Rich
mearls said:You wouldn't have a controller, but it is possible to create a martial one.
(BEGIN triumphant laugh)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
(END triumphant laugh)
![Devious :] :]](http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/devious.png)
mearls said:You wouldn't have a controller, but it is possible to create a martial one.
True, that sounds pretty good. A gearhead's dream. I wonder if that's not only a by-product of 4E, but the core of 4E. Perhaps this time it's really a toolset (as d20 was partially intended to be) with added fantasy flavour - meaning that it's just the fleshed out version of a generic, mix-and-match game system that is at the bottom of 4E - which means that 4E might be more transferable to other genres than 3E.ainatan said:Interesting.
If all that differentiates classes are their talents, feats, class skills and their flat bonuses to Defenses and BAB, it's gonna be simple to come up with a classless game.
It also implies that roles and power sources are pure subjective terms, maybe...
I like it!
I never had a real issue with them, but it did feel like an after-thought. This is probably a good thing.Mercule said:Interesting. I thought I was in the minority for wanting spell-less rangers.
I agree, and the quick answer is that it's easier to write a stream-of-conscious message board post than it is to write a proper article using formal language that has to be approved by your superior (and perhaps even commissioned by said superiors) before being handed over to the editors, who then hand it over to the techie guys who put it on the website, etc etc.AZRogue said:I just find it funny that this is from a random message board post and not an interview or design article, lol. This kind of hint/tidbit is what people want to see. More good was done with this one post than the last month worth of articles together, I imagine.![]()
I know what you mean...Lord Tirian said:True, that sounds pretty good. A gearhead's dream. I wonder if that's not only a by-product of 4E, but the core of 4E. Perhaps this time it's really a toolset (as d20 was partially intended to be) with added fantasy flavour - meaning that it's just the fleshed out version of a generic, mix-and-match game system that is at the bottom of 4E - which means that 4E might be more transferable to other genres than 3E.
Cheers, LT.