Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ph0rk" data-source="post: 8129152" data-attributes="member: 16266">The problem here being that spell versatility wasn't designed to do something across the board, so, yes, it is relevant.SV, as written in the UA, made sorcerers have even more spell access than wizards in certain scenarios, particularly the late game (when wizards are strongest).Buffing all or most casters to be as strong as wizards doesn't fix the intra-class balance problem in 5e; it just leaves martials further in the lurch. A nerf to wizards is the better choice.Sorcerers are not weak nor are they limited in utility options... relative to other classes. Relative to wizards, yes, but if we go buffing every class that feels weak next to a wizard in their current state we'll never be done.</blockquote>